article thumbnail

Legal Analysis Of Copyright Issues In YouTube And Other Social Media Content

IP and Legal Filings

2017) 236 DLT 478 (DB). [1] 2017) 236 DLT 478 (DB). Facebook Twitter LinkedIn WhatsApp The post Legal Analysis Of Copyright Issues In YouTube And Other Social Media Content first appeared on IPLF. Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs Myspace Inc & Anr. 7] Super Cassettes Industries Ltd. Vs Myspace Inc & Anr.

article thumbnail

Generative AI: the US class action against Google Bard (and other AI tools) for web scraping

Kluwer Copyright Blog

In the plaintiffs’ reasoning, the development of the AI by Google began in 2017, when it introduced the “Transformer” neural network, a revolutionary framework underpinning the LLM. The LLM is “ the very underlying technology that fuels AI chatbots across the AI industry ” (§ I.62).

Fair Use 137
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights in the Metaverse: Navigating the Virtual Frontier

IIPRD

AM General LLC, the manufacturer of the popular Humvee military vehicle, initiated an accusation against the publishers of the video game Call of Duty in 2017, claiming that the game’s depiction of the vehicle violated trademark laws by imitating its design.

article thumbnail

Copyright and Artificial Intelligence in Music Creation

IP and Legal Filings

The current legal landscape struggles to address the complexities of AI-driven content creation, leaving ownership rights ambiguously defined and vulnerable. This verdict, while precedent-setting, underscores the pressing need for India to modernize its IP laws. Rana & Co.) link] accessed 16 February 2024. [2]

Music 103
article thumbnail

The Other ‘Maybe’ Authors: Copyright Ownership for AI Trainers

IP Intelligence

“The Ninth Circuit recently acknowledged that some authorities ‘suggest that the copyright protection afforded a computer program may extend to the program’s output if the program “does the lion’s share of the work” in creating the output and the user’s role is so “marginal” that the output reflects the program’s contents.’” Rearden LLC v.

article thumbnail

The Other ‘Maybe’ Authors: Copyright Ownership for AI Trainers

LexBlog IP

That is, “superintending the arrangements” of content creation, being the effective cause and having decision-making authority on the final output are the hallmarks of control, not absolute certainty as to what the output would yield. ’” Rearden LLC v. Walt Disney Co. , 3d 963, 968 (N.D. Unigate Enter. ,

article thumbnail

Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Because negates Section 230 on two independent grounds (FOSTA and content creation), Mindgeek has two separate reasons it could lose. So there’s no doubt that this judge is twisting the law to accommodate the victim’s horrifying circumstances. ” This Section 230 ruling puts Mindgeek into a major legal conundrum.

Blogging 139