JIPL Online

MARCH 15, 2021

Then, the post will predict how Netflix may shift its content practices, defense strategies, and settlement tactics as a result of their past litigation successes in copyright actions. SETTLEMENT CASES. 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] TRIAL CASES.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Public Domain Derivative Work 98

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 8, 2024

CV H-17-1068, 2017 WL 2957912, at *8 (S.D. July 11, 2017) (holding that “the mere purchase of AdWords alone, without directing a consumer to a potentially confusing web page, is not sufficient for a claim of trademark infringement,” citing Mary Kay, 601 F. See Tempur-Pedic N. Mattress Firm, Inc. , in the Adler v. McNeil case.

Trademark 101

Trademark Advertising Advertising False Advertising 101

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

DECEMBER 15, 2021

The Lenz case got a lot of press, but it ended with a confidential settlement. The court also credits the self-serving claim by the successor licensee that it considered fair use by comparing the works and evaluating if the works were being sold commercially or for other purposes. Signal 23 Television v.

Registration 114

Registration Fair Use Copyright Designs 114

LexBlog IP

APRIL 20, 2022

It has been noted as to the US Supreme Court’s requirement that it render before its summer break decisions in all cases argued in the current term and dispose of as many cert. ” Then, as I noted , the US Supreme Court decided a few days later, “in Google v. at 7-9) were transformative.,” ’ (Op.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Music Copyright Fair Use 52