2017 Advertising Privacy Social Media 
43(B)log
JANUARY 19, 2022
14, 2022) Once in a blue moon, a false advertising-based antitrust claim survives a motion to dismiss in a circuit that imposes a list of excessive requirements on such claims. Consumers and advertisers adequately alleged that Facebook has monopoly power in social network/social media (consumers) and social advertising markets.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 18, 2024
My roundup of the top Internet Law developments of 2023: 10) California court bans targeted advertising (?). Regulators have sought to suppress online targeted advertising for years, with only minimal success. In turn, advertisers have fled Twitter. 4) Social media “defective design” lawsuits go forward.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
43(B)log
MARCH 28, 2024
26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. The consent judgment was a lump sum and, Princeton argued, included uncovered claims; most of the images fell within the 2017-18 period.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 27, 2023
Moreover, contrary to The Satanic Temple’s novel argument, domain registration is not the same as registration for a social media website.” Code § 3344, which is predicated upon “knowing[ ] use[ ] … for purposes of advertising.” ” * Hoffmann Brothers Heating and Air Conditioning, LLC v. March 29, 2023).
LexBlog IP
APRIL 19, 2023
A new track by Drake and The Weeknd is going viral on social media and is bound to top the charts. Data Privacy Data privacy may eventually create a path to protection but this will not come easy. And state or federal laws are unlikely to restrict use of publicly available songs on privacy grounds. ” White v.
Intepat
MAY 16, 2023
A fraudulent lottery-winning message with Amitabh Bachchan’s voice from KBC was viral through various social media platforms and many people fell into this trap. Ramkumar Jewellers (2012), the defendant copied the plaintiff’s advertisement picture containing a popular artistic pose of Amitabh Bachchan and Jaya Bachchan.
IP and Legal Filings
FEBRUARY 20, 2024
Union of India [1] , established that privacy is an essential Fundamental right under Article 21 of the Constitution. Unauthorised use of someone’s identity is a violation of both their personality rights and their basic right to privacy. The Court rejected the privacy defence, which is often employed in IP proceedings.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content