2016 Copying Non-Fungible Tokens 
IP and Legal Filings
DECEMBER 25, 2022
In this paper, it is argued that Private-property law must be the field of law governing transactions involving Non-Fungible Tokens. This isn’t the case with real-world property, where one is in fact the owner of a physical copy of a book they have purchased. [4] Peak Computer, Inc., 2d 511 (9th Cir.
Plagiarism Today
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
First off today, Samantha Handler at Bloomberg Law reports that the film studio Mirimax has filed a copyright infringement lawsuit against director Quentin Tarantino over Tarantino’s plans to release of Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) related to the film Pulp Fiction. NFTs are unique digital tokens tracked by a blockchain.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 28, 2022
Non-fungible tokens (“NFTs”) continue to be popular. 11 of 2008, dated April 21, 2008, regarding Electronic Information and Transactions, as amended by Law No 19 of 2016, dated November 25, 2016.• 20 of 2016, dated December 1, 2016, regarding the Protection of Personal Data in Electronic Systems.
Traverse Legal Blog
AUGUST 16, 2022
Slip Copy (2016) (District Court Opinion). Court Documents Of Interest. Drape Creative, Inc., Gordon-v-Drape-Creative-Inc-1 Download. Drape Creative, Inc., 3d 257 (2018). Gordon-v-Drape-Creative-Inc Download. Complaint Yuga Labs v Ryder Ripps. 031138067085 Download. Anti-SLAPP Motion Against Yuga Labs.
IP and Legal Filings
SEPTEMBER 8, 2021
Apart from this, Non-Fungible Tokens, the brainchild of Kevin McCoy and Anil Dash, is a unit of data stored in a digital ledger that certifies that the digital asset is unique and is hence non-interchangeable. In 2016, the USPTO rejected Bitcoin’s trademark application.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content