This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
INTRODUCTION For a long time, logos, names, and jingles have been the mainstays of trademarklaw. A recent trend in branding, however, is the use of non-traditional trademarks such as haptic markings. Still, despite such advancement, tactile marks are among the least common forms of non-traditional trademarks. [2]
The company had been using the name for several years in the payday loan business, and in 2012 expanded into pawn shops and then filed for registration for that usage in 2013. The USPTO then granted the registrations associated with the new uses.
An expungement proceeding allows for cancellation, in whole or in part, of a trademarkregistration between three and ten years old if the mark has never been used in commerce with some or all of the registered goods and/or services. For the latest developments on trademark scammers, check, Is This a Trademark Scam?®.
Tech giant Apple has recently filed a lawsuit against the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and Director Kathi Vidal over the Office’s refusal to register Apple’s “SMART KEYBOARD” trademark based on genericness. Apple asks the district court to require USPTO to approve its SMART KEYBOARD mark registration.
However, the same process does not include any examination or verification to determine whether the domain name is distinctive or capable of distinguishing itself from the competition, i.e., existing domain names that are clearly in violation of trademarklaw.
And the number of active trademarkregistrations in the USPTO database is larger than ever. Additionally, since late December 2021, when new procedures went into effect, the USPTO has received around 100 expungement petitions and about 100 re-examination petitions to get rid of registrations for marks that are allegedly not in use.
The Single Judge Bench (SB) consisting of Justice Sanjeev Narula made some intriguing observations regarding the trademarkability of the mark “Aashiqui” as a movie franchise and restraining its use by other entities. These entities generally do a check to avoid duplication before registration, however, such registration lacks legal sanctity.
The number of applications filed, and registrations granted in FY2020 both grew over the prior year, to the highest in history. trademarkregistrations! Hundreds of trademark applications filed this year referenced masks , COVID, quarantine, social distancing, and other pandemic topics. 2015: [link]. 2018: [link].
The Board granted a petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark CS for "amplifiers," finding that Petitioner Adamson Systems proved by a preponderance of the evidence that Respondent Peavey Electronics had discontinued use of the CS mark on amplifiers, with intent not to resume use. Lanham Act, Section 45.
It is this judgment that more or less laid the foundation of “trans-border reputation” in Indian trademarklaw. Whirlpool was able to claim rights over its trademark in this country, even though it didn’t have a physical presence here and did not have any registration at that time. 3d 983 (2015).
However, the extent of protection and applicable principles of trademarklaw that surround the numeral trademark takes center stage in the discussion. Names like 7-eleven, 5 Star, 7Up, and 99acres resonate with consumers, widely reflecting the innovative use of number as brand identities.
A fundamental principle of trademarklaw permits the owner of a well-known trademark to forbid third parties from using it in a manner that would lessen its distinctiveness. In accordance with a provision of trademarklaw known as trademark dilution, the owner of a brand may. What is Trademark Dilution?
In its process to debunk the claims Daily basket through its website also mentioned That except the word basket there existed no similarities or trademark violations in the brand logo and the name,colour and font itself was different. [4] 4] That Daily Basket had an entirely different user interface and the get-up was also way different.
Genesis of the Dispute According to this report on Mint (paywalled), the Lodha siblings (Abhishek and Abhinandan) parted ways in 2015. Further, HoABL has filed for registration of their TM in the same class (36- real estate affairs; 37- building construction) as Macrotech developers. 500 crores (disputed figure).
McCarthy , the leading treatise on trademarklaw explains that “[t]he concepts of ‘generic name’ and ‘trademark’ are mutually exclusive. The party opposing registration has the burden to prove genericness by a preponderance of the evidence. Hyatt , 566 U.S. 431, 446 (2012); see also Shammas v. Focarino , 784 F.3d
Many film titles or names like Dhoom (ID: 1319835), Padman (ID: 3749859), 3 Idiots (ID: 1940729), and Singham (ID: 3672533), have been registered as a service mark under class 41, of the fourth schedule of the Trademark Rule, 2001. These registrations aid in allocating precedence. This idea sort of gets the job done of a copyright.
The Defendant argued that the suit design was published prior to the date of registration under a different trade name. What has to be seen is whether the coolers bearing the suit design were available online prior to the date of application, by the plaintiff, for registration of the design. Case: Mr. Ashok Kumar Gupta & Anr vs Ms.
The Trade Marks Act, 1999 governs trademarklaw in India and provides for the registration, protection, and enforcement of trademarks. 14 provides that if anyone files an application for the registration of a trademark, the consent of the living person must be taken and it should not be falsely or fraudulently obtained.
As a result, the logo and name are registered as trademarks under the act of 1999 to protect the brand name and value. Trademark Infringement. The trademark legislation of 1999 protects Indian trademarks. If a mark or logo is used with the permission of the authorised person, it is not considered a trademark infringement.
As a result, the logo and name are registered as trademarks under the act of 1999 to protect the brand name and value. Trademark Infringement. The trademark legislation of 1999 protects Indian trademarks. If a mark or logo is used with the permission of the authorised person, it is not considered a trademark infringement.
A very interesting and unorthodox legislative style from the UAE legislator was to introduce an opening provision clarifying the policy behind the Law. Trademarks are protected by registration with the IP Department. A GCC TrademarkLaw was issued in 2006. No doubt this approach will help the Courts.
The Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 (“TMA”) becomes effective on December 27, 2021 and makes several important amendments to federal trademarklaw (the Lanham Act) intended to modernize trademark application examinations and clean house of trademarkregistrations for marks not used in commerce.
As a result, it will only be possible to submit claims at the commercial courts, in the form of a counterclaim, in trademark infringement proceedings. Royal Decree-Law 23/2018 , which transposes Directive 2015/2436 relating to trademarks, introduces this change in legislation. How much will it cost to file a claim?
This case began with a 2015 application by Interprofession du Gruyère, a Swiss registered association, and Syndicat Interprofessionnel du Gruyère , a French syndicat for a certification mark GRUYERE. INTERPROFESSION DU GRUYÈRE, et al., DAIRY EXPORT COUNCIL, et al.,
This was apparently untrue and in a separate 2008 proceeding, the PTO concluded that this was a false statement, at least as to boots, and cancelled TA’s registration of the METAL mark. Topolewski almost immediately reapplied for the mark, this time through Metal Jeans, which obtained the “METAL” registration in 2013.
The CAFC overturned the TTAB's decision [ TTABlogged here ] dismissing Charles Bertini's Section 2(d) opposition to registration of APPLE MUSIC for a host of services, including the production and distribution of sound recordings and presentation of live music performances. Apple, Inc. 2021-2301 (Fed. April 4, 2023) [precedential].
This case began with a 2015 application by Interprofession du Gruyère, a Swiss registered association, and Syndicat Interprofessionnel du Gruyère , a French syndicat for a certification mark GRUYERE. INTERPROFESSION DU GRUYÈRE, et al., DAIRY EXPORT COUNCIL, et al.,
European trademarklaw requires genuine use of a trademark to maintain registration. Lack of use may cancel a trademark’sregistration; as well, any oppositions based on a trademark without genuine use may not withstand a non-usage defense. . In 2015, Doga?aji’s
§ 1052(c) on registering marks concerning a living person without permission; this case has the possibility of altering trademarklaw significantly and allowing current events to be treated similarly to historic events from a trademark perspective. But one can expect, now that cert. ” Id. (at at 1165-66).
It can also mean as the proxy or substitute holder of rights here on earth because no spiritual being will receive a copyright certificate, trademarkregistrations, or letters patent. courts have denied registration to religious marks as being offensive to other believers or to non-believers. ” But neither the PTO nor U.S.
Since 2015, TIR has made its specialist content available via the website mistressharley.com (NSFW) and through authorized third parties under licensing agreements. When TIR sent a trademark/copyright complaint to the host but received no response, the adult company did a WHOIS lookup for cryptoservers.biz.
In the playpen that is nonverbal marks, the game is all about whether registrants can jump the hurdle between two opposing classifications—product packaging and product configuration. 2D (BNA) 1964 (TTAB 2015). In response, TTAB did not merely deny Lululemon registration. 113 U.S.P.Q.2D Even with proven secondary meaning?
The Supreme Court first looked to the section of the Lanham Act governing remedies for trademark violations, 15 U.S.C. 10 According to Fossil, the equity courts historically required plaintiffs to establish willfulness, or its historical equivalent, to obtain a profits award in trademark disputes. & ECON. Weightman, supra note 28.
We soon learn that "TrademarkLaw Reform" refers to aspirations to tackle contemporary problems in trade mark law worldwide, whether by means of legislative overhaul or not, put to paper by some of the world's leading experts. But make no mistake: behind the cover is a veritable treasure trove of thought-provoking scholarship.
Jaitley’s right and pronounced that any person may be restrained from using the names of popular or well-known celebrities, when the particular name is a well-known trademark as envisaged under the basic principles of trademarklaw and thatcelebrity is entitled to use his name for commercial purposes. 2007, I, no.
Trademarks are governed by the Trademarks Act of 1999 and the Trademark Rules of 2017 in India which provides for registration and protection of Trademarks from fraudulent practice. 2] In recent times, many people are misusing the goodwill of others by “trademark squatting”. “The
2024 has been an explosive year for IP developments in India, with more IP divisions coming up in different High Courts, an increasing number of IP registrations and an overall higher degree of attention on IP issues in the country. to clarify that registration does not grant exclusive right in a part of the mark.
Elster to determine if the PTO violated Steve Elster’s First Amendment right to free speech when it declined to federally register his trademark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts. The PTO had denied registration under 15 U.S.C. Brunetti , the Federal Circuit’s decision was almost certainly correct. [4]
. § 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent….”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content