Remove 2015 Remove Patent Infringement Remove Registering Trademarks Remove Registration
article thumbnail

Gema USA, Inc. Sues Former Employee for Alleged Patent & Trademark Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

Registration No. Registration Date. January 6, 2015. is not an authorized Gema distributor and upon information and belief, does not sell “new” Gema products but rather sells knocks-offs using the Gema Trademarks without authorization. OPTISELECT. According to the Complaint, Defendant, First in Finishing, Inc.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (September 6 – 12)

SpicyIP

I covered the recommendations of the Report which includes reforming Section 3(p) of the Patents Act to incentivize TK-based innovation, creating a proper documentation mechanism to prevent misappropriation of TK, and registration of traditional knowledge as GIs. The Ministry had claimed that 14.2 Other News from Around the World.

Reporting 104
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Five Widely Recognized Brands Accused of Being Copycats in the Market

Kashishipr

Hydrox was largely discontinued in 1999, and it was in September 2015 when the product was reintroduced by Leaf Brands. It was in 2019 when Nike filed a Patent Infringement lawsuit against Skechers by calling it out for copying Nike’s strategy.

article thumbnail

IP as Collateral

IIPRD

Eastman Kodak pledged many of its patents, notably the one which consisted of a method for enabling persistent recognition of individuals in images. This was done during 2012-2015 when it faced bankruptcy. As a result of which it pledged many of its patents as collateral. Trademark as Collateral in the US.

IP 40
article thumbnail

Spicy IP Weekly Review (December 11 to December 17)

SpicyIP

Delhi High Court Comes Down Heavily on the Patent Office for Delay in Passing the Order Image by Freepik DHC comes down on the Patent Office for a four-year delay in issuing an order. Read this post by SpicyIP intern Jyotpreet on what this means for the delays in patent prosecution timelines. Khimji Dayabhai Co.”, and Ors. ,

IP 59