2015, Derivative Work, Intellectual Property Law and Settlement

Search:

DAY

WEEK

MONTH

YEAR

Select your country:
Sign up | Log in

2015

Derivative Work

Intellectual Property Law

Settlement

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

xxiv] Intellectual property law recognizes a limited monopoly-esque property right for the creator. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v] Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W.

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” The Compendium specifically excludes works alleged to be created by a divine being.” ” Welsh (2015) at 134.

Intellectual Property

Intellectual Property Pulse

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

Stay Connected