Remove 2015 Remove Derivative Work Remove Intellectual Property Law
article thumbnail

AI and Fair Use: Navigating Legal Challenges in India and the United States

IIPRD

History has shown that US courts have a very liberal and dynamic approach to fair use, whether the use is transformative or ends up harming the market for the original work. 2015) [1] is one of the most cited cases in this context. 2015) [2] Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. Google, Inc. 1] Authors Guild v.

article thumbnail

The Interplay of Personality Rights and Freedom of Expression- the Jackie Shroff’s Case’

IP and Legal Filings

The personality rights in India are generally enforced in the context of Intellectual Property Laws. The generative AI has been on the forefront of the legal actions, and alleged violations of intellectual property rights have been on the rise since the inception of generative AI. Baby Gift House & Ors.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

IT’S THE COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT FOR ME: WHY CLAIMS AGAINST MEME CONTENT SHOULD NOT MATTER

JIPL Online

xxiv] Intellectual property law recognizes a limited monopoly-esque property right for the creator. Miceli, Law and Economics: Private and Public 23 (West Academic Publishing 2018). [v] Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W.

article thumbnail

WHAT, IN THE NAME OF GOD, …?: Intellectual Property Rights In Holy Names, Sacred Words, & Other Aspects of Creation

LexBlog IP

That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” The Compendium specifically excludes works alleged to be created by a divine being.” ” Welsh (2015) at 134.

article thumbnail

With Friends Like These: Copyright Implications Of Novelists Drawing Inspiration From The Real Lives They Cross

LexBlog IP

Dorland counterclaimed for copyright infringement, claiming that Larson’s use of Dorland’s letter was a violation of intellectual property law. Larson also sought a declaration that she owns the copyright to The Kindest and that the letter in the short story does not infringe Dorland’s copyright.

article thumbnail

007: License to Infringe

Dear Rich IP Blog

Dear Rich: Ian Fleming's Casino Royale entered the public domain in Japan in 2015, 50 years after his death. Additionally, does the public domain status of Casino Royale allow me to use the book title and the character of James Bond in derivative works, such as films? Can a public domain work acquire copyright protection?