2015 Copyright Infringement Copyright Law Intellectual Property Law 
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
Part 1 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 is available here , and parts 3 and 4 will be published on the blog over the coming days. . A decision in 2015 concerned the definition of “public” in the act of communication.
JIPL Online
APRIL 9, 2021
ii] Existing copyright law is ineffective in its application to new forms of digital media. iii] While intellectual property remedies are painfully slow, the internet is on the cutting-edge of fast paced communication. LAW AND ECONOMICS. Costs Versus Benefits of Copyright Protection. 8, 2015), [link].
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
AUGUST 31, 2021
SAS argues that it made a “plethora of creative choices” in developing its material, and that creativity is more than sufficient to satisfy the originality requirements of copyright law. Thus far, the courts have disagreed with SAS and rejected its copyright assertions. 702 (2015). Landes & Richard A.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
Parts 1 and 2 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here and here , and part 4 will be published on the blog shortly. In addition to rights of the author, German copyright law also recognises related rights.
IPilogue
NOVEMBER 17, 2021
These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
The personality rights in India are generally enforced in the context of Intellectual Property Laws. In the absence of a separate law safeguarding personality rights, the court granted relief by invoking passing off as governed under the Trade Marks law. Further in the case of Civic Chandran and Ors.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
Parts 1 to 3 of this post (originally published in “Auteurs & Media”) summarising case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof from 2015 to 2019 are available here , here and here. Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. Claims under copyright law. Right of remuneration (Sections 32 et seqq.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content