2015 Cease and Desist Settlement 
TorrentFreak
AUGUST 23, 2021
BREIN certainly doesn’t shy away from taking matters to court but whenever it can, settlements and an agreement to cease and desist can be enough to ward off more serious action. Operation Shut Down, Settlement Reached. BREIN Targets a 350,000 Track DJ Record Pool Service.
IP and Legal Filings
OCTOBER 26, 2023
The modus operandi of bullying and legal threats which are baseless by large entities gets initiated by serving a cease and desist notice which contains threats of instituting a trademark infringement suit. Further the defendants were also restrained from issuing any other baseless threats. [3]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Trading Secrets
AUGUST 17, 2022
Since 2015, the SEC has brought at least 14 enforcement actions involving Exchange Rule 21F-17(a). The action arose because, between April 2015 and April 2019, Brinks used an employee confidentiality agreement that prohibited employees from disclosing confidential company information to any third party without Brinks’ prior written approval.
Trading Secrets
JANUARY 24, 2024
Morgan Securities, LLC (“JPMS”) for allegedly including overbroad release provisions in settlement agreements. And, as we previously blogged , the SEC historically had limited enforcement activity for Rule 21F-17(a), with roughly 14 enforcement actions between 2015 and 2021.
LexBlog IP
JANUARY 24, 2024
Morgan Securities, LLC (“JPMS”) for allegedly including overbroad release provisions in settlement agreements. And, as we previously blogged , the SEC historically had limited enforcement activity for Rule 21F-17(a), with roughly 14 enforcement actions between 2015 and 2021.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
NOVEMBER 8, 2021
337-TA-1186 (finding violation of Section 337 and issuance of a General Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders)—and one other Investigation (Inv. 337-TA-1219) was terminated based upon settlement. 15, 2015); Balanced Armature Devices , Order No. Certain Opaque Polymers , Inv. 337-TA-883, Comm’n Op. at 19 (Jun.
The IP Law Blog
MARCH 2, 2021
When settlement discussions proved fruitless, Romag sued. But the majority and concurring opinions’ directive that mental state is a “highly important consideration” should mean that losing the willfulness requirement will not make it easier for spurious filings aimed at extracting a quick settlement. & ECON.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
144 
Let's personalize your content