2015 Brands False Advertising 
43(B)log
MARCH 9, 2022
His marks are enrolled in Amazon Brand Registry, and Royal Silk Direct maintains an authorized Royal Silk “storefront” on Amazon.com. Melwani alleged that Amazon’s Brand Registry has not offered proactive brand protection and that it has been “almost impossible” to remove any listing through Amazon’s Brand Registry.
SpicyIP
AUGUST 2, 2024
Image from here Manu Bhaker’s Olympics Victory: Do Brands Violate Publicity Rights by Putting out Congratulatory Posts? Moment marketing” refers to a strategy where brands can take advantage of ongoing events to gain relevance, and especially for some of the sheen of patriotic athletic victories to wear off on them.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Erik K Pelton
DECEMBER 20, 2022
Besides Mariah, there were many other celebrity trademark stories this year, as more an more celebrities launch more and more brands. On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for false advertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2015: [link]. The firm has registered more than 4,000 U.S.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 25, 2021
In 2015, it extended the “Align” mark to yoga apparel, which has generated $1B in sales. lululemon’s brand also displays prominently in its keyword ads. FTC. * New Jersey Attorney Ethics Opinion Blesses Competitive Keyword Advertising (…or Does It?). lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company.
43(B)log
OCTOBER 4, 2021
While Illinois Tool sat on its hands, not only did J-B Weld’s sales grow, but it expanded its brands into more stores and launched new variants (like “Perma-Lock Green”). So the fact that J-B Weld had low sales in 2015 is not an excuse for delaying, but rather a reason why Illinois Tool should have acted then.
43(B)log
AUGUST 1, 2022
ICC develops model building codes and standards; it sued a competitor, UpCodes, for false advertising (Lanham Act, NY GBL, and common law unfair competition). A plaintiff cannot state a false advertising claim based on such a statement because, by definition, it cannot be proven false. UpCodes Inc., 4th - (2d Cir.
43(B)log
JULY 15, 2022
In addition, the jury reasonably (if just barely) could have found that Core Health began to manufacture Max Racks after the agreement expired in November 2015.” Payment of the profits on those units reduced Core’s monetary liability, but not the violation. “In But the evidence of this was “relatively insubstantial.”
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
69 
Let's personalize your content