Remove 2015 Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising Remove Trademark
article thumbnail

dissatisfaction w/Amazon's partner program isn't TM infringement/false advertising

43(B)log

7, 2022) Melwani owns the Royal Silk trademark for “a wide variety of products.” Similar searches were also “frustrating”; Melwani alleged that the search results were “erroneous, scattershot, mingled” as well as “consistently confusing, misleading, false, and deceptive.” False designation of origin/false advertising: Lasoff v.

article thumbnail

Using dominant competitor's part names/numbers for comparison isn't false advertising, TM infringement, or (c) infringement

43(B)log

15, 2023) Simpson sued its competitor MiTek for using Simpson part numbers for structural connectors/fasteners for use in the construction industry in its catalogs/other promotional material; the court here, after a nonjury trial before the magistrate judge, rather comprehensively rejects its false advertising, trademark, and copyright claims. (It

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2022

Erik K Pelton

The year saw many trademark stories in the news as backlogs continued at the USPTO even while application filing numbers dropped from their all time highs during the two previous years. Here are the biggest trademark stories of 2022 that we have been following at EMP&A. Celebrity trademark messes. Queen of Christmas.

Trademark 130
article thumbnail

Gema USA, Inc. Sues Former Employee for Alleged Patent & Trademark Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

The United States Patent and Trademark Office issued Patent Nos. January 6, 2015. is not an authorized Gema distributor and upon information and belief, does not sell “new” Gema products but rather sells knocks-offs using the Gema Trademarks without authorization. First in Finishing, Inc.’s Registration No. Registration Date.

article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. In 2015, it extended the “Align” mark to yoga apparel, which has generated $1B in sales. In 2015, it extended the “Align” mark to yoga apparel, which has generated $1B in sales. Greenberg v.

article thumbnail

4th Circuit continues its Lanham Act frolic, notes overbreadth of expansive injunctive relief

43(B)log

Ignoring entity shifts: De Simone used to license a probiotic formula to Alfasigma, which continues to make a probiotic under the same trademark, VSL#3, but now with a different formulation. Now De Simone’s entities compete with Alfasigma. Defendants argued that, under In re GNC Corp., 3d 505 (4th Cir. The district court disagreed.

article thumbnail

Netflix prevails over claims by lawyers that they were misportrayed in money laundering film

43(B)log

23, 2020) MFSA brought trademark dilution and false advertising claims against Netflix for its portrayal in the film “The Laundromat.” Libel/false light claims aren’t addressed in this decision; see below.) Rogers governed the false advertising claim. Trademark dilution/tarnishment.