43(B)log

NOVEMBER 23, 2022

Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. Ultimately, AHBP took an exclusive license to sell the product in Argentina, with purchasing and advertising/marketing spend minimums. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived.

False Advertising 99

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Business 99

43(B)log

MARCH 28, 2024

26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. Defendants counterclaimed for payment and damages for breach of contract and bad faith.

Advertising 64

Advertising Advertising Settlement Contracts 64

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 19, 2021

Plaintiff attempted to plead that a small number of calls to people contracting with it constituted “commercial advertising or promotion,” but the court still didn’t buy it. The parties compete to manage vacation rental properties located in Oregon, and plaintiff alleged a smear campaign against it. In Grubbs v. Sheakley Grp.,

Advertising 59

Advertising Advertising Marketing Marketing 59

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 7, 2023

CCDH urges brands to not advertise on sites that promote disinformation. X Corp suggests that these efforts have resulted in reduced advertising levels on Twitter. Brandwatch, obtains data from Twitter under a contract, and then offers various tools to analyze its database. Are the reports advertisements?

Social Media 52

Social Media Reporting Contracts False Advertising 52

43(B)log

MAY 12, 2022

They are: the Unfair Competition Law (UCL); the False Advertising Law (FAL); and the Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA). While they often cover the same conduct in false advertising cases and are cumulative of each other, they have differences. 2015) (cleaned up). 2015) (cleaned up). Superior Court, 9 Cal.5th

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Business 59

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 7, 2022

But Nestlé pointed to no evidence that plaintiffs knew about the controversy before 2015, creating a genuine dispute about what they knew or should have known. So too for breach of contract claims: CUTPA provides that “[a]n action under [CUTPA] may not be brought more than three years after the occurrence of a violation.”

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Law 59

43(B)log

AUGUST 12, 2021

Safelite allegedly falsely advertised that (1) “if damage spreads beyond the size of a dollar bill, a replacement will be necessary”; (2) “when a chip is smaller than a dollar bill, it can usually be repaired without replacing the windshield.” Safelite counterclaimed for trade secret theft not related to advertising.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Marketing 59