Remove 2015 Remove Advertising Remove Brands Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

dissatisfaction w/Amazon's partner program isn't TM infringement/false advertising

43(B)log

His marks are enrolled in Amazon Brand Registry, and Royal Silk Direct maintains an authorized Royal Silk “storefront” on Amazon.com. Melwani alleged that Amazon’s Brand Registry has not offered proactive brand protection and that it has been “almost impossible” to remove any listing through Amazon’s Brand Registry.

article thumbnail

Top Trademark Trends of 2022

Erik K Pelton

Besides Mariah, there were many other celebrity trademark stories this year, as more an more celebrities launch more and more brands. On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for false advertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2015: [link]. The firm has registered more than 4,000 U.S.

Trademark 130
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

2d Cir. attempts to explain when puffery can be found as a matter of law

43(B)log

ICC develops model building codes and standards; it sued a competitor, UpCodes, for false advertising (Lanham Act, NY GBL, and common law unfair competition). A plaintiff cannot state a false advertising claim based on such a statement because, by definition, it cannot be proven false. UpCodes Inc., 4th - (2d Cir.

article thumbnail

Text of Complaint in X Corp v. Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH) in CD Cal, regarding not-for-profit’s reports on Twitter disinformation policies

LexBlog IP

CCDH urges brands to not advertise on sites that promote disinformation. X Corp suggests that these efforts have resulted in reduced advertising levels on Twitter. Based on the complaint, a 43(a)(1)(B) false advertising cause is a bit of an uphill battle. Are the reports advertisements?

article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2015, it extended the “Align” mark to yoga apparel, which has generated $1B in sales. lululemon’s brand also displays prominently in its keyword ads. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company. Google cases.

article thumbnail

Likely confusion alone justifies liability but not damages or profits in exercise equipment case

43(B)log

In addition, the jury reasonably (if just barely) could have found that Core Health began to manufacture Max Racks after the agreement expired in November 2015.” Payment of the profits on those units reduced Core’s monetary liability, but not the violation. “In But the evidence of this was “relatively insubstantial.”

article thumbnail

Laches bars TM claims but what counts as "Made in the USA" merits trial

43(B)log

But genuine fact issues remained on whether J-B Weld’s advertising of “Made in USA” was false and whether Illinois Tool had standing. While Illinois Tool sat on its hands, not only did J-B Weld’s sales grow, but it expanded its brands into more stores and launched new variants (like “Perma-Lock Green”).