Remove 2014 Remove Due Diligence Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

Structuring the IP financial exchange

IP and Legal Filings

In the United States, the first financial exchange focusing on the IP asset was established in 2014. Keeping this in mind, we should delve into the market-based approach of the same. Tech-driven companies have a total dependency on the IP and as per some estimates; around 80% of the market value comes from these intangible assets.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Affirms Availability of Back-Damages Under Copyright Discovery Rule

Patently-O

The Supreme Court introduced a major complication in its 2014 Petrella decision via a seemingly offhand comment that no damages can be recovered for infringements occurring more than three years before a copyright lawsuit is filed. 663 (2014). Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. ,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

NFTs: New Frontiers for Trademarks

IP Tech Blog

The Amended Complaint emphasizes the growing importance of NFTs in the fashion and brand markets, and accuses Rothschild of usurping opportunities that rightfully belong to the brand owner, Hermès. Although NFTs have been around since 2014, their far-reaching, multi-layered legal implications are just now being recognized.

article thumbnail

NFTs: New Frontiers for Trademarks

LexBlog IP

The Amended Complaint emphasizes the growing importance of NFTs in the fashion and brand markets, and accuses Rothschild of usurping opportunities that rightfully belong to the brand owner, Hermès. Although NFTs have been around since 2014, their far-reaching, multi-layered legal implications are just now being recognized.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Fixes One Problem with the Copyright Statute of Limitations, But Punts Another — Warner Chappell Music v. Nealy (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

1962 (2014). Under the “discovery rule,” the limitations period begins to run when “the plaintiff discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the injury that forms the basis for the claim.” 2014) (collecting cases). 663, 671 (2014)…. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. , 663, 134 S. Petrella , 572 U.S.

Music 105
article thumbnail

Clash of Trademarks: PhonePe vs. PostPe

Intepat

Introduction It is not uncommon for market competitors to find themselves in a courtroom confrontation over trademark infringement cases. The court ruled in favour of BharatPe regarding their Buy Now Pay Later (BNPL) product, which had been extensively promoted and marketed by the company.

article thumbnail

The Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the Discovery Rule for the Copyright Act’s Statute of Limitations — Starz v. MGM (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

1962 (2014), the U.S. Under the “discovery rule,” the limitations period begins to run when “the plaintiff discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the injury that forms the basis for the claim.” 2014) (collecting cases). MGM (Guest Blog Post) appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog.