Remove 2014 Remove Artistic Work Remove Inventor
article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Rights in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: Navigating Challenges and Seizing Opportunities

IIPRD

Analyzing the convergence of AI and IPR laws, it elucidates the challenges and ambiguities in recognizing AI as inventors or creators. Ai doesn’t understand what it’s doing in the way that a person does but functionally what it is doing is the same thing that an author or an inventor may be doing.

article thumbnail

National IPR Policy : An Analysis

IP and Legal Filings

[i] The very first accords to recognise why IPRs are important were the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property (1883) and the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886). iii] Bayer Corporation vs. Union of India 2014 (60) PTC 277 (Bom). [iv] iv] Sameer Wadekar & Anr.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Critical Analysis on Intellectual Property Rights and its components.

IIPRD

It is basically giving a right to the original creator, so that no one uses that work. This is basically for literary and artistic work. Patents : – It is a right which is granted to protect the interest of an invention, to protect the interest of the inventors for their new inventions. 24863/2014. [3]

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

SpicyIP

UK Supreme Court Confirms No Patent for “AI-invented” Inventions Image from here On December 20, the UK Supreme Court affirmed its previous decision to deny registration to inventions by Dr. Stephen Thaler’s AI DABUS, holding that an AI software cannot be listed as an inventor. SpicyIP intern Vedika discusses this development.