This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
First published February 14, 2013. The post Best of 2013: WAL-ZYR versus ZYRTEC: Allergic to legislating trademarklaw? I have no problem using the TTABlog for a blog launching point every week. Why would I when I can riff on a post such. appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
One of the most effective ways to protect your brand and all that it owns, including distinctive features, is through the registration of a trademark. Trademarklaw grants legal protection of your business name, logo, or slogan against other individuals using the same with regard to protection over intellectual property.
Dollar Financial holds registered trademarks for MONEY MART – the name it uses for its payday and title loan venders as well as pawn shops and pawn brokerages. The company had been using the name for several years in the payday loan business, and in 2012 expanded into pawn shops and then filed for registration for that usage in 2013.
Although the Community Trademark Office first rejected the application since the mark cannot be graphically represented as per Article 4 of the Community Trademark Regulation in the EU legislation, the applicants challenged the Trademark office’s decision. Smell marks and Indian trademarklaws.
Originally posted 2013-01-08 13:57:37. Republished by Blog Post PromoterPresident Obama is suffering from the right-of-publicity blues again. And now maybe we understand why he wants an intellectual property anti-counterfeiting lawyer on the Supreme Court — this could rise to the level of an international incident already, Jack!
The Single Judge Bench (SB) consisting of Justice Sanjeev Narula made some intriguing observations regarding the trademarkability of the mark “Aashiqui” as a movie franchise and restraining its use by other entities. Murugadoss (2013) concerning the title “Raja Rani” and by the Bombay HC in Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd v.
Disclaimers/Laura Heymann’s work in 2013: a consumer protection law approach to disclaimers about where you expect to find information. But some areas do acknowledge nonbinary status: descriptiveness. If one meaning is descriptive then it’s kept open; if acquired distinctiveness is proven then there can be protection.
Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademarklaw firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2020: [link]. 2013: [link]. The firm has registered more than 3,500 U.S. 2019: [link].
After six years of judicial practice, the punitive damages clause in the TrademarkLaw was revised to one to five times the actual damages in 2019 from one to three times the actual damages in 2013. In the same year, the Anti-Unfair Competition Law was also introduced for the first time, with the same range of one to five times.
Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademarklaw firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2021: [link]. 2013: [link]. The firm has registered more than 4,000 U.S. 2020: [link].
[viii] This massive dichotomy in prices forces fans to choose between the Scylla of paying hundreds of dollars for a jersey to support their favorite team because of sports licensing monopolies, and the Charybdis of perpetuating trademark infringement by knowingly or unknowingly patronizing these shady, unregulated vendors. (ii)
3] [Image Sources: Shutterstock] Starbucks vs. Charbucks: This long-running dispute from 2001 to 2013 over a small New Hampshire coffee roaster’s use of “Charbucks” for dark roast coffee, arguing that Starbucks had diluted its famous trademark, places a number of issues regarding trademark dilution and parody at the very centre of this case.
In other parts of the notice, takedowns were requested under trademarklaw. When Apple worked with MarkMonitor back in 2013, records show the company operated the domain mm-apple.com. A similar notice sent to GitHub in 2020 took content down using the DMCA.
In Mohan Meakin Ltd v AB Sugars Ltd (2013), wherein the mark TALL MOM was deemed identical to OLD MONK on grounds of phonetic similarity, despite the difference in product categories (former being country liquor and latter being Indian Made Foreign Liquor), the Delhi HC found infringement under section 29(2)(c), while presuming consumer confusion.
Pelton & Associates ®, a boutique trademarklaw firm in Falls Church, Virginia. trademarks for clients and has represented hundreds of parties in trademark disputes. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2019: [link]. 2013: [link]. The firm has registered more than 3,000 U.S. 2018: [link]. 2017: [link].
In Trademarklaw, it is important to determine if the mark is being used to offer goods and services similar to the ones for which it is registered. Prafull (2013). Macrotech Developers similarly, he argues, has filed the suit to protect their brand. Lets assume that HoABL and Macrotech developers operate in distinct businesses.
Originally posted 2013-02-06 13:58:13. Republished by Blog Post PromoterWho but the ultimate trademark pig the NFL would make unwilling third parties endorse their sponsors? Makes me want to throw a SUPER BOWL PARTY! The post The ugly side of branding appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™.
Originally posted 2013-08-21 01:25:09. Sand Hill Advisors, LLC — a trademark case […] The post Likelihood of — well, no, actually. Republished by Blog Post PromoterAt least in some parts of the country, LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION is something judges actually sometimes don’t find. Out there, for example. The left.
In 2013, Constellation acquired perpetual, irrevocable, and exclusive license rights in the Corona marks, which gave Constellation the right to sell products under the Corona trademark. However, Modelo Grupo (“Modelo”) and Constellation Brands (“Constellation”) would say there is a lot riding on the answer.
And then what if I told you that the practice has had precedent since 2013? a 2013 TTAB case, does just that. 2d 1684 (TTAB 2013). That you could submit a product configuration mark to TTAB and not only get denied registration, but that they could tell you that you can never reapply? Even with proven secondary meaning?
com” at after a generic word, “Booking,” still makes “Booking.com” generic within traditional trademarklaw [xiv] and (2) the fact consumer identify “Booking.com” doesn’t change the fact that it is still generic and thus ineligible for trademark registration. [xv] 21, 2013), [link]. [vi] Booking.com B.V., at 2301 (2020).
” Originally posted 2013-07-10 14:26:04. It rejects the stupid and unconstitutional argument that “commercial use” under the Lanham Act’s dilution provisions can be found where there is simply “diversion.” Republished by Blog.
While doing so, the Court disregarded many of the foreign judgements cited by Google which held invisible use of trademarks as failing to constitute infringement; and highlighted the stark differences in trademarklaw in each jurisdiction, especially when compared to India. 202 (2013) DLT 291; Kapil Wadhwa & Ors.
Note that even the patent and trademarklaw requires mandatory registration on the transfer/assignment of intellectual property (Section 45 Trademark Act 1999; Section 68 Patents Act 1970). These records provide banks with a clear history of ownership of that land and thus assure them of the valid title of the borrower.
Mr. Pelton supervised the Trademark Clinic at Howard University School of Law from 2020 to 2024 and has been an adjunct trademarklaw professor at Georgetown University since 2023. 1] Moreover, according to a 2013 report from WIPO, small and medium-sized enterprises rely more heavily on trademarks than patents. [2]
But after 2013, when Respondent last advertised the CS amps in its domestic catalogs, domestic sales plummeted, rapidly dwindling to single digits and then zero at some points in the critical 2016-2021 time frame. Lanham Act, Section 45.
Under US trademarklaw the test for genericness is comprised of two parts: (1) what is the genus of goods or services at issue; and (2) does the relevant public understand the designation primarily to refer to that genus of goods or services. Emmi AG was the parent company of Emmi Roth and a member of Interprofession du Gruyère.
The Federal Circuit’s pair of decisions provide guidance on how logos factor into the design patent infringement inquiry, and begin to tease-out differences in policy concerns underlying design patent law versus trademarklaw. See, e.g. , Groeneveld Transp. Efficiency, Inc. Lubecore Int’l, Inc. , 3d 494 (6th Cir.
201 (Spring 2013). Washington State’s Proposed Employer Social Media Law: The Legislature Should Take a Cautious Approach — SB 5211. Big Problems in California’s New Law Restricting Employers’ Access to Employees’ Online Accounts (Forbes Cross-Post). Social Media and TrademarkLaw” Talk Notes. TELECOMM. &
However, with the publication on 23 October 2012 of UAE Federal Law No. 4 of 2012 Concerning Regulation of Competition all businesses with operations in the UAE or supplying goods and services to the UAE market will have to ensure that they focus on and comply with the provisions of this new law. A GCC TrademarkLaw was issued in 2006.
It has marketed its software under the name “SmartSync” since 2004 and obtained a trademark for SmartSync in 2007. It sells its software primarily to the United States Navy but, in 2013, sold its software to at least one major pharmacy chain.
In 2013, Interprofession du Gruyère, sought and received from the USPTO a certification mark for a design with stylized font, for the letters “AOC”, a Swiss cross, and the words “LE GRUYÈRE SWITZERLAND.”
Topolewski almost immediately reapplied for the mark, this time through Metal Jeans, which obtained the “METAL” registration in 2013. This was apparently untrue and in a separate 2008 proceeding, the PTO concluded that this was a false statement, at least as to boots, and cancelled TA’s registration of the METAL mark.
Trademarklaw underwent substantial changes, both multilaterally and regionally. The Paris Convention established the beginning of the international trademark system, and the Paris Union was expanded by a distinct union which is collectively known as the Madrid system.
More recently in 2020, Sankalp Jain discussed the copyright challenges in “Dreams,” a video game enabling user-generated content, arguing for the Indian copyright law’s limitations in addressing the the issues around the fan-made creations within the game. Relevant here are Arun C.
Unlike UDRP, it is governed by the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 and hence, binding in the court of law 8. Despite no separate law on the protection of domain name, Indian courts have, over the years, given protection under the trademarklaw. Judicial Decisions. M/s.Matrimony.com Limited v. Comm.Div.).No.223
The legislative history indicated that 411(b) was one of “a number of changes to copyright and trademarklaw that will enhance the ability of intellectual property rights holders to enforce their rights.” See, e.g. , DeliverMed Holdings, LLC v. Schaltenbrand , 734 F.3d 3d 616, 625 (7th Cir. Legal Background: Registration.
Can “honest concurrent use” be used as a defense against a trademark infringement claim? Lokesh, highlighting its history, argues that honest concurrent use is a principle of trademarklaw and is not limited to a provision. Delhi High Court Imposes Costs worth INR 2 Cr. on Triveni Interchem Pvt.
Google, for example, first filed the trademark application for Google Chromecast in the Kingdom of Tonga on June 5, 2013 before filing it with the USPTO a month and a half later. Jamaica seems to be just one of many jurisdictions without a searchable online trademark database. Loophole or fair strategy?
Second , it has been argued that the court merely espoused the settled principles of trademarklaw that ‘common’ names and phrases cannot be monopolized. 576 (2013), decisions and their progeny are too rigid and that an Australian more “nuanced” approach to such matters is worth a look.
Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademarklaw. Defendants' 2013 documentary Both parties’ works are “docu-fiction” set in Baltimore. Defendants' 2013 documentary Both parties’ works are “docu-fiction” set in Baltimore.
Some “highlights” of 1-800 Contacts’ trademark jurisprudence over the years: 1-800 Contacts v. WhenU (2d Cir. A major plaintiff loss against an adware vendor, and who likes adware??? 1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com (10th Cir. 1-800 Contacts (FTC 2018).
Originally posted 2013-10-29 12:56:20. The post Old trademarks never die… appeared first on LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION™. They just fade away. Republished by Blog Post Promoter.
Google argued that even when the keyword is a trademark, it is never used in a ‘trademark sense’, thereby the invisible use of trademarks, as keyword, failing to meet the threshold to constitute infringement. Several petitions in the Madras High Court challenged the validity of rule 29(4) of the Copyright Rules, 2013.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content