Remove 2013 Remove Invention Remove Public Use
article thumbnail

How Does One “Use” Flowers?

Patently-O

Here, the Federal Circuit has affirmed that the claims are invalid based upon a pre-filing trade-show display of the ornamental plant — holding that the display counted as a “public use.” ” The inventors here used conventional plant breeding to create a new form of petunia (Calibrachoa). Microsoft Corp.,

article thumbnail

Post-Grant Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Post-grant review was introduced by the America Invents Act (AIA) as a counterpart to inter partes review. For technologies other than covered business method, post-grant review is only available for patents with a priority date later than March 15, 2013. Final Rules for Trials before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

“What’s Mine Is Not Yours To Give Me”—Nor To Take Without Just Compensation: A New Jersey’s Reaction To Sovereign Immunity, Intellectual Property, & Takings

LexBlog IP

And, it goes like this–the relevant concept in the United States is that a person shall “ no[t] be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” Wright , 94 U.S. ”); James v. Campbell , 104 U.S. 2d 480 (Fed.

article thumbnail

Biosimilars 2020 Year in Review

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

This presumption is a departure from the traditional framework for analyzing the legality of patent settlements set forth by the Supreme Court in the 2013 case, FTC v. Actavis , under which an antitrust plaintiff bears the burden of proof. 9,643,997, which is directed to protein purification. A jury trial is scheduled for May 17, 2021.