2013 Invention Licensing Ownership 
Patently-O
AUGUST 26, 2022
The basis for the argument was that the application that led to the patent-in-suit had been filed while Afana had been married (to Kassam) and, by operation of Texas’ community property law, Kassam had an ownership interest in the issued patent that had not been assigned to Mobile Equity and had not been joined as a co-plaintiff.
Patently-O
MAY 1, 2024
May 1, 2024) offers some interesting insight into leveraged patent transactions, and the effect of a lender’s ability to license or assign a patent on the patent owner’s standing to sue for infringement, especially after default. Zebra Techs. 2022-2207 (Fed. ” IT sued Zebra for infringement in the W.D.Tex.,
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Patently-O
FEBRUARY 9, 2022
Sgromo owned two patents that he transferred to Scott’s company Eureka Inventions. Sgromo then negotiated a license deal from a third-party, but that income was designated as coming to Eureka. 251 (2013) (patent attorney malpractice does not arise under the patent laws). Peter Sgromo v. Leonard Scott ( Fed. July 2, 2018).
Kashishipr
JUNE 3, 2021
In the modern world, things such as overseas inter-company transactions of IP, franchising models, licensing, mergers, and acquisitions, etc., Even for authentic inter-company transactions for royalties or license fees, tax authorities of most developed nations necessitate tax on IP assets. The United States of America.
The IPKat
JANUARY 27, 2023
Background In early 2013, Mr. Jing was hired into a Laboratory at the University of Oxford as a research intern, and contributed to the development of a microscope (the Nanoimager). In Oct 2013, Mr. Jing commenced his DPhil studies (PhD equivalent), signing a contract which included the University’s IP Provisions.
Patently-O
JANUARY 19, 2024
Ownership Rights : Roku argued Universal lacked ownership rights to assert the ‘196 patent because when Universal filed its ITC complaint, it had recently filed a petition to correct inventorship to add a Universal employee. On appeal, the Federal Circuit has affirmed, rejecting each of Roku’s three primary arguments.
Patently-O
DECEMBER 21, 2022
Patents filed before March 2013 are examined using the pre-AIA rules of patentability, including 35 U.S.C. 102(f): A person shall be entitled to a patent unless — (f) he did not himself invent the subject matter sought to be patented. The figure above compares the Falzoni design with that found in Plastipak invention (Fig 2).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
54 
Let's personalize your content