Remove 2013 Remove Copyright Law Remove Personality Rights
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Novembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Spadika Jayaraj discussed a case where the Delhi High Court dismissed a suit by a media house accusing copyright infringement on its database of users. The issue has often arisen in the context of protecting confidential information through copyright law. E.g., see Prateek Surisetti’s post here and Niyati Prabhu’s post here.

article thumbnail

BALANCING PUBLIC INTEREST AND CORPORATE RIGHTS: LESSONS FROM THE UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD V. RAMESHWARI PHOTOCOPY SERVICE CASE

Intepat

Introduction Intellectual property laws are generally divided into industrial property and copyright. While copyright is distinct from other forms of intellectual property by focusing on personal rights, its primary role is to manage and protect knowledge.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

What is Right of Publicity? Protect Your Name and Likeness. 2024 Update

Traverse Legal Blog

International Variations: Similar rights exist in other countries, often referred to as “personality rights” or “rights of persona.” Right of Publicity v First Amendment And, like copyright infringement, Right of Publicity is also subject to First Amendment defenses.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

Several petitions in the Madras High Court challenged the validity of rule 29(4) of the Copyright Rules, 2013. The petitioner contented that Jayalalithaa’s personality rights and her family’s privacy rights should be protected and that the productions may be incorrect and misleading. Saregama India Limited v.

IP 143
article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2024

SpicyIP

Weve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so its a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The decision by Punjab and Haryana High Court is also notable for explicitly stating that one needs to be a celebrity to be able to claim personality rights.

IP 105