Trading Secrets

JUNE 24, 2021

As a conclusion to this webinar , we compiled a summary of takeaways: A restrictive covenant is a legal term for a clause in an employment contract (or a standalone agreement) that prevents an employee from doing something. Vast majority of cases involve misappropriation by electronic means.

Contracts 52

Contracts Confidentiality Business Litigation 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 21, 2021

Anatomy of an M&A Transaction: How to Issue Spot for Non-Compete, Trade Secrets/Confidential Information, and Intellectual Capital Concerns. At the workshop, legal scholars, economists, and policy experts reviewed the current state of the law and economic literature on non-compete clauses in contracts between employers and employees.

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Law Contracts Business 52

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 26, 2022

Conversely, SB 672 explains that “covenants not to compete” do not include confidentiality or non-disclosure agreements, trade secret protection agreements, or agreements entered into in connection with purchase and sale transactions, among others. Premier Dealer Services, Inc., 2d 938 (Ill. The scope of the activity restrictions.

Confidentiality 52

Confidentiality Business Contracts Law 52

Patently-O

FEBRUARY 22, 2023

As noted above, one of the five sitting ALJs tasked with reviewing those cases, ALJ Cameron Elliot, has ordered third-party litigation funding orders to be produced and indicated, in at least one case, that such funding should be treated as non-confidential. [31] 604C (2021); Nonrecourse Civil Litigation Advance Contracts, Ohio Rev.

Litigation 126

Litigation Reporting Settlement Government 126

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

FEBRUARY 4, 2021

This presumption is a departure from the traditional framework for analyzing the legality of patent settlements set forth by the Supreme Court in the 2013 case, FTC v. Non-Confidential Brief for Plaintiff-Appellant at 25, 35.) Corrected Non-Confidential Opening Brief of Plaintiff-Appellant at 1–3.) See 17-cv-01407, Dkt.

Litigation 52

Litigation Settlement Marketing Marketing 52

LexBlog IP

JUNE 7, 2023

Confidential nature of the EUIPO’s findings. The report on the determination of FRAND terms and conditions includes: (i) a confidential assessment of the FRAND determination; (ii) a confidential summary of the main issues of disagreement; and (iii) a methodology and an assessment of the FRAND determination.

Licensing 52

Licensing Patent Confidentiality Registration 52

Trading Secrets

DECEMBER 29, 2022

Protecting Confidential Information and Client Relationships in the Financial Services Industry. Anatomy of a Restrictive Covenant. How and Why Texas Is Different When It Comes to Trade Secrets and Non-Competes. How Multijurisdictional Businesses Should Approach Non-Competes. its training procedures, and its off-boarding policies.

Confidentiality 59

Confidentiality Business Law Contracts 59

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 29, 2022

Protecting Confidential Information and Client Relationships in the Financial Services Industry. Anatomy of a Restrictive Covenant. How and Why Texas Is Different When It Comes to Trade Secrets and Non-Competes. How Multijurisdictional Businesses Should Approach Non-Competes. its training procedures, and its off-boarding policies.

Confidentiality 40

Confidentiality Business Law Contracts 40

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 11, 2022

Starting in 2013, state legislators nationwide have enacted laws regulating biosimilar substitution. The parties’ stay carved out a dispute related to the protective order and limited use of Bioepis’s confidential information for a Danish proceeding. ( On November 3, 2021, the court entered the parties’ confidential stipulation (Dkt.

Litigation 52

Litigation Settlement Patent Marketing 52

LexBlog IP

APRIL 4, 2023

Stryker was involved in three other cases against Alphatec involving other former Stryker employees, and the Sixth Circuit found that Abbas “was privy to confidential information that if disclosed to Alphatec or Alphatec’s counsel, would detrimentally affect Stryker” in those other lawsuits. Marietta, Dist. where the U.S.

Confidentiality 40

Confidentiality Blogging Litigation Reporting 40

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 31, 2024

Orders Passed in Applications number 201733044715 on July 22 and 4889/CHE/2013 filed by Tata Steel and Haynes Ltd on September 18 [Indian Patent Office] 2024 saw numerous instances of remands from different High Courts back to the Patent Office (for some of these cases see here ).

IP 105

IP Invention Patent Copyright 105