Remove 2012 Remove Inventor Remove Public Use
article thumbnail

I was already like this before you got here: prior use as an exception to patent infringement

Garrigues Blog

This seems like the perfect time, then, to talk about one of the scenarios in which (IP wise) the past can prove to be extremely important when facing the future: the right of prior use to counter infringement of patents or utility models. What is the right of prior use or “pre-use”? 201/2012, of 28 May 2012 ).

article thumbnail

Celanese v. ITC: Can a Secret Manufacturing Process Be Patented After Sale of the Resulting Product?

Patently-O

Historically, an inventor could choose to protect a new manufacturing process either by patenting it or by keeping it as a trade secret – but not both. 1983) (sale of product by a third party who had kept its process secret does not prohibit an independent inventor to patent the process). Gore & Assocs., Garlock, Inc. ,

article thumbnail

The US’ Review of March-in Rights, and Some Questions on an Indian Counterpart

SpicyIP

The purpose of this right is to enable the government to fully realise the potential of the public-funded IPR in question if it is being underutilised by the inventor institute. which requires patented products to be significantly manufactured in the US until it is commercially infeasible.