This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The single color or color combination of a product’s packaging can obtain Trademark Protection only if it is capable enough to be recognized by the general public as unique or belonging to a specific brand. It also encourages safeguarding the interests of the traders and consumers in the market. For more visit: [link].
C Union of India (2012). Therefore, the Court’s approach amounts to an unsubstantiated piercing of the corporate veil while not taking into account relevant principles and case laws. Existing trademarklaws sufficiently address online infringement without needing a new “e-infringement” category.
For more, read the article Olivia Muller and I recently wrote for the American Bar Association: The Growing Threat of Trademark Scams. The biggest individual brand story of the year was Facebook’s announcement of its new META brand. NFT trademarks. Trademark filings related to non-fungible tokens (NFTs) exploded in 2021.
In 2012, the Meenaxi registered the two word marks with the USPTO (THUMS UP & LIMCA). A case like this begins with the territorial doctrine of trademarklaw: Under the territoriality doctrine, a trademark is recognized as having a separate existence in each sovereign territory in which it is registered or legally recognized as a mark.
Established, but offensive, brands change names. Never before have some many brands backed away from names or name origins that were offensive. Uncle Ben’s, Eskimo Pie, Aunt Jemima, Washington Redskins, and Cleveland Indians are some of the brands began name changes or removed items from their logo in 2020. 2012: [link].
Celebrity trademark messes. Besides Mariah, there were many other celebrity trademark stories this year, as more an more celebrities launch more and more brands. Erik Pelton® has been making trademarks bloom since 1999 ® as the founder of Erik M. Past issues of Top Trademark Trends: 2021: [link]. 2012: [link].
million,” showing that despite government agency efforts, the prevalence of counterfeit merchandise that infringes on sports team trademarks remains a constant problem. ii) Policy rationales behind trademarklaw and their application in the sprots apparel context. In Scandia Down Corp. Euroquilt, Inc. ,
Name saturation is an existential challenge for every industry that harnesses trademarklaw to protect its brand. You can explore what are known as non-conventional trademarks — sounds, colors, smells — to convey your brand messaging. As more and more names are registered, fewer are available for use.
However, outside the realm of brand marketing, when celebrities make use of a phrase, to the point of it becoming associated to them, it becomes a catchphrase of their own. Positionin India Indian judicial position regarding copyright and trademark of celebrity catchphrases is not clear. For instance, in the U.S.A.,
The] evidence indicates that there was bona fide domestic use of the CS mark on amplifiers in the ordinary course of trade from 2012 through 2015. In the 2012-2015 period, Respondent’s domestic sales, measured in dollar amounts, were in the five-to-six figure range annually. Lanham Act, Section 45. emphasis by the Board).
Generic terms are incapable of functioning as registrable trademarks denoting source, and are not registrable on the Supplemental Register or on the Principal Register after having acquired secondary meaning. This protected designation was superseded by adoption of the Protected Designation of Origin (“PDO”) for GRUYÈRE in 2001.
He was unmistakably aware of the nuances regarding colours in trademarklaw. Broadly speaking, trademarks are of two types: traditional and non-traditional. [1] Notwithstanding the essence of this finding, this is too narrow an interpretation of the true spirit of trademarklaw. Anubaker CS (COMM) No.890/2018
Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. Monaghan Trademark Owner Sues Over Alleged Twittersquatting–Coventry First, LLC v. CH When Does A Parody Twitter Account Constitute Criminal Identity Theft?–Sims Kravitz An Update on PhoneDog v.
Generic terms are incapable of functioning as registrable trademarks denoting source, and are not registrable on the Supplemental Register or on the Principal Register after having acquired secondary meaning. The European Union recognized the PDO in 2011 in an agreement between the European Union and Switzerland in 2011.
Companies seek to protect the value of their trademarks since they can be quite valuable to the brand. Under trademarklaw, however, phrases are frequently deemed not to disclose the commercial origin of products or services, which is a trademark’s primary role.
Canada— Since the 2012 Federal Court decision in Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer v Attorney General Of Canada ( T-1650-10), sound marks have been registrable in Canada, as noted here ; and. The equity of an instantly recognisable – ideally catchy – sound that creates subconscious connections with a brand is immense.
If the property of a person can be protected, likewise, when a popular celebrity like Amitabh Bachchan faces possible harm regarding his brand, the same can be protected under his right to publicity. Through various case laws, the scope of publicity rights has been expanded by the Indian judiciary. Under this Act, Sec.
The complaint claims that artificial intelligence-created deepfakes of Anil Kapoor and his name-branded websites defraud customers. However, it may be more appropriate to consider trademarklaw as a comparable framework for comprehending the extent of the personality right. National Law School of India Review , 31 (1), 125–148.
Although “third parties have used Flora-Bama in the titles of third parties’ artistic works with Plaintiffs’ oral or written permission,” that doesn’t make this a title-v-title case: Basic trademarklaw demonstrates why. This justification is at least consistent with the core idea of trademarklaw. Grimaldi, 875 F.2d
In an October 2012 post, Kruttika Vijay highlighted the Supreme Court’s concerns over the lack of transparency in clinical trials in India. DRS , where the court held that ad-words are not inherently violative of trademark rights. We must think through these and more solutions and do so sooner rather than later.
The Court reasoned that when the Act was amended in 2012 – internet broadcasting was not alien to India and if the Legislature intended Section 31D to apply to internet broadcasting, it would’ve done so by specifically amending the provision. The rejection order is authored by Dr. Latika Dawara, Asst. Music Broadcast Ltd.
Both suits were filed before the 2012 amendment to the Copyright Act. Further, given that the 2012 amendment does not have a retrospective effect, the Court held that the amendment has no effect on the legal position. The Division Bench reiterated that what makes something a trademark is the power to distinguish a product from others.
What if we tell you that there is a drug that is used for treating diabetes, but has a similar/ almost identical brand name as another drug used for treating a type of cancer. Eerily the issue of similar brand names for different drugs treating different ailments is pretty common in India. Surprising, isn’t it?
Panel #2, TM, moderated by Vice Dean Felix Wu Jack Daniels says that use as a trademark is special: like copyright’s bête noire, confusion caused by trademark use is the central concern of trademarklaw. Punchbowl News/Hog Farm cases seem like branding uses—establishing independent identity under the mark.
Jeanne Fromer (with Beebe and Stein), An Empirical Picture of TrademarkLaw We are running out of competitively effective word marks. Jake Linford: Thinks of both Abercrombie and Seabrook as asking the same question of sending the consumer a signal of branding. Thus distinctive brand assets, like brand names, logos, jingles etc.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content