2011 Moral Rights Ownership 
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
And who poses moral rights in the work? This chapter also describes the methodology for the qualitative empirical research that involved 20 interviews conducted during 2011-13 with participants from the theatre community including actors, playwrights, directors, and producers. The monograph is presented in six chapters.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2022
The notion of stewardship (H R Howe, ‘Copyright limitations and the stewardship model of property’ (2011) 2 IPQ 183-214) is instrumental to expanding the scope of the analysis on vulnerable authors (e.g. A copyright lawyer will be familiar with legal issues on subject matter, originality, authorship and ownership. What is it?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 19, 2023
Protection Of Personality Rights Under Ipr Although the provisions of the country’s current IPR laws can be used as an indirect reference, the law dealing to such a violation of image rights has not received exclusive recognition under Indian law. In Titan industries v. M/S Ramkumar jewellers, CS (OS) No.2662/2011,
SpicyIP
AUGUST 26, 2024
Globally, these rights are codified in statutes like the Lanham Act in the US, but, in India, they mainly arise from the constitutional right to privacy under Article 21, and as extensions to the moral rights of performers enshrined under Sections 38, 38A and 38B of the Copyright Act. Baby Gift House & Ors.
The IPKat
JANUARY 25, 2025
Authorship and ownership of outputs The most interesting aspect of the Vatican AI Guidelines is however another and its the authorship and ownership of AI-generated outputs. The Vatican approach is admittedly intriguing, also considering the long-vexed issue of ownership of AI-generated outputs.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content