Remove 2011 Remove Litigation Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

The Interplay between Religious Sensitiveness and Trademark Law in India

IP and Legal Filings

As a result, the rise of hypersensitivity to religion, religious texts, and religious symbols determines the jurisprudence around the utilisation of such marks under Indian trademark law, even if they are not strictly prohibited. 6] Section 9(2)(b) of the Indian Trademarks Act, 1999. [7] 8] 2011 (48) PTC 235 (Del.) (DB)

article thumbnail

An Explorative Study on the Liability of Domain Name Registrars with reference to Trademark Infringement.

IP and Legal Filings

However, the same process does not include any examination or verification to determine whether the domain name is distinctive or capable of distinguishing itself from the competition, i.e., existing domain names that are clearly in violation of trademark law.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Landmark Trademark Battles: Shaping Brand Protection Globally and in India

IP and Legal Filings

Such disputes, very often setting important legal precedents, influence trademark protection and enforcement globally. FAMOUS CASES OF TRADEMARK INFRINGEMENT 1.Foreign Samsung : This was a case, from 2011 to 2018, where Apple took the word against Samsung, claiming infringement of its smartphone design and utility patents.

Brands 98
article thumbnail

Google’s Search Disambiguation Doesn’t Create Initial Interest Confusion–Aliign v. lululemon

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. Amazon. * More Evidence Why Keyword Advertising Litigation Is Waning. * Court Dumps Crappy Trademark & Keyword Ad Case–ONEPul v. lululemon is the well-known yoga gear company.

article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Fixes Ninth Circuit’s Test for Mistakes in Copyright Registrations—Unicolors v. H&M (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The one actually litigated in the case (these images come from the complaint) is here.) b)(4)(i)(A) (2011). b)(4)(i)(A) (2011). Note, however, that EH101 was not one of the confined designs, so that it was made available to the public in January 2011.). 574 (2011). b)(4) (2021).] 3d at 1196. 3d at 1196.

article thumbnail

John Doe Order Issued Against “Taarak Mehta” Infringers: Revisiting the Rights Vested in Fictional Characters

SpicyIP

Network Solutions Private Limited (2011), a rare decision of the time on personality rights and cybersquatting , to the recent slew of orders in Amitabh Bachchan v. The Court has, thus, set a clear precedent for the emerging swathe of litigation in this regard. Baby Gift House & Ors. Rajat Nagi & Ors.

article thumbnail

Courts Still Have No Clue How to Determine Who Owns Social Media Accounts–JLM v. Gutman

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Gutman created a Pinterest account in 2011 and an Instagram account in 2012, shortly after she began working for JLM. I’d love to see an accounting of the time and money the parties have spent on this litigation. Nevertheless, the Supreme Court cases cast a long shadow over future proceedings in this case.