2011 Copying Moral Rights 
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 22, 2021
And who poses moral rights in the work? This chapter also describes the methodology for the qualitative empirical research that involved 20 interviews conducted during 2011-13 with participants from the theatre community including actors, playwrights, directors, and producers. The monograph is presented in six chapters.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
FEBRUARY 28, 2024
Over the course of a decade, Google copied large volumes of books and made them available online, both through excerpts, known as “snippets”, and as entire publications. style fair use: South Korea adopted it in 2011 , and it has been considered for adoption by Australia. As such, it was permissible under United States copyright law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
MAY 18, 2024
Facts Mr T trained as an editor at a film and audiovisual school run by ECAR CAMPUS from 2009 to 2011. In its 2010/2011 student guide, the school's internal regulations stated that “ students grant their school permission to use their work exclusively for educational and non-commercial purposes, to promote the school to the general public ”.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
Using someone else’s identity without their consent violates both their personality rights as well as their right to privacy. Network Solutions Private Limited and Ors Case (2011) , the Hon’ble Delhi High Court noted that an individual’s online reputation or popularity is a reflection of their real life.
LexBlog IP
AUGUST 31, 2022
petition (at 5 ), “Respondent VIP Products LLC copied Jack Daniel’s marks and trade dress to make a dog toy, ‘Bad Spaniels,’ that imitates a Jack Daniel’s whiskey bottle while adding poop humor.” Petition at page 5 (quoting Memorandum Opinion, copy at Appendix, page 18a ). According to the cert.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
145 
Let's personalize your content