This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising? HDR appeared first on Technology & Marketing Law Blog. The court rejects both claims. June 8, 2022). The complaint.
3, 2021) The parties compete in the market for custom landscape design services. “[I]n I]n February 2010, Natorp’s began using approximately 24 of McCleese’s photos on its commercial website.” Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims. McCleese v. Natorp’s, Inc., 1:20-cv-118 (S.D.
The parties compete in the market for buying gold from ordinary people. In 2010, the Today Show—a morning television show aired on the NBC network—aired a segment in which it mailed a single item of gold to ten different mail-in precious metals dealers and compared the prices offered.
In 2010, the Second Circuit issued a watershed decision about secondary trademark infringement. Any error on country-of-origin disclosures sets up the third-party sellers for falseadvertising claims. Per Malwarebytes , the online marketplace should qualify for Section 230 protection for the Lanham Act falseadvertising claims).
22, 2021) The parties compete in the market for “chemical bonding products—like epoxies, adhesives, threadlockers, gasket makers, and silicone sealants—that someone might buy at a hardware store to fix their car or for other mechanical projects.” J-B Weld began in 2010 to sell theadlockers under the “Perma-Lock” name.
The complaint alleged that market research indicates that many Americans prefer foods and drinks with “free from” claims because they believe such products are more natural, healthier, and less processed, and that they are willing to pay more for such products.
23, 2024) Plaintiffs alleged that defendants conspired to inflate the US News ranking of USC Rossier School of Education by submitting inaccurate or incomplete data to US News and market the resulting ranking to the public. News and World Report’s 2010 edition of America’s Best Graduate Schools.”
But Industria does not advertise or sell its Zenú or Ranchera products in the United States and there are no market surveys specific to the United States for Zenú or Ranchera. Prior import plans in 2010-11 were paused. In light of the size of the food market, that’s a bit hard to credit.
21, 2021) Though TocMail made it past a motion to dismiss , it failed at the summary judgment stage in its claim that Microsoft falselyadvertised its link scanning service’s capabilities, thus locking TocMail out of a big market. Safe Links is part of Microsoft’s anti-phishing and anti-malware Defender package.
American Girl applied for trademarks on a space-themed doll named Luciana Vega, which it began marketing in 2018 as its “Girl of the Year” doll. I will note here, as I often do, that in a falseadvertising case these allegations would likely be treated as conclusory at best. But the cases go back and forth on this.]
Premier sold Joint Juice for treating/preventing joint pain; a jury found it liable to a consumer class for falseadvertising under NY law; and the district court awarded statutory damages to the class, but cut them by over 90%. The court also rejected challenges to certain evidentiary rulings at trial.
These guidelines target practices such as false urgency, basket sneaking, subscription traps, confirm shaming, forced actions, nagging, interface interference, bait and switch, hidden costs, and disguised ads. On March 13, the Delhi High Court granted an ex parte interim injunction in Markets and Markets Research Pvt.
Thus, at trial, defendants weren’t allowed to present evidence showing that Hawai‘i doctors and patients hadn’t changed how they prescribed or consumed Plavix after information about the poor responder issue was added in 2010 to the black box warning.
Dark Patterns Unmasked: Examining Their Influence on Digital Platforms and User Behaviour Srijaa Grover and Yaggya Kapoor Harry Brignull introduced the concept of “dark patterns” in 2010, describing them as deceptive tactics aimed at boosting conversion rates. The DoCA had illustrated 10 practices as dark patterns. They are: 1.
Rimini Street is a third-party provider and direct competitor with Oracle in the support-services market. After the first Oracle lawsuit in 2010, the court found that Rimini infringed Oracles copyrights by engaging in cross-use and creating copies of Oracles materials on Riminis computer systems.
Ventis also advertised Enduracaine and Endura-KT as comparable to, and replacements for, EXPAREL. It marketed Endura-KT as safe and acceptable for use, advertised that Endura-KT provides an EXTENDED DURATION of pain relief and that it is Quick Onset Long Lasting, Safe, for Pediatric Use, and Cost Effective. Irwin, 601 F.3d
25, 2024) This interesting lawsuit relies on Targets curatorial reputation for the falseadvertising claim. Given this broader Target marketing landscape, plaintiffs were entitled to more expansive inferences about reasonable consumers. [W]hile 393 (2010), as applied by the Eleventh Circuit to Alabamas law, Lisk v.
21, 2022) Geomatrix sued defendants for Sherman Act violations and falseadvertising in the market for onsite wastewater treatment systems, aka septic systems. Other defendants allegedly used their roles in the standard setting process “to disparage and preclude Geomatrix products from the market.”
Accidental” addition of medical marijuana IDs in 2010 led to rise in applications; withdrawn. A: will be talking to PTO historian; they ended up offering to refund fees to 2010 applicants if they’d abandon them, so may never find out what happened there. Eric Johnson: have they been successful in pushing others out of the market?
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content