This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
22, 2022) The court here allows an antitrust claim to proceed based in part on allegedly false/misleading statements because they form part of the alleged anticompetitive product-hopping scheme and because the unique characteristics of the drug market make market-based responses to falseadvertising difficult.
Is it falseadvertising for Facebook to describe the groups as “private”? Does that create a claim for falseadvertising? The court rejects both claims. The ECPA requires the plaintiff to show that “her posts in the Groups were not readily accessible by the general public.”
On November 7 th , Conde Nast sued Drake and 21 Savage for $4 million for falseadvertising and infringing Vogue’s trademarks. 2010: [link]. The court issued a preliminary injunction and the duo agreed to no longer use Vogue’s marks in connection with the album. Metaverse and NFT Filings Decrease. 2020: [link]. 2019: [link].
I]n February 2010, Natorp’s began using approximately 24 of McCleese’s photos on its commercial website.” Along with copyright claims, McCleese asserted Lanham Act falseadvertising claims. McCleese v. Natorp’s, Inc., 2021 WL 2270511, No. 1:20-cv-118 (S.D. The parties disagree about how and whether they were authorized to do so.
In 2010, the Today Show—a morning television show aired on the NBC network—aired a segment in which it mailed a single item of gold to ten different mail-in precious metals dealers and compared the prices offered. Express Gold Cash, Inc. Beyond 79, LLC, 2020 WL 9848431, No. 18-CV-00837 EAW (W.D.N.Y. 15, 2020) Previous opinion.
But genuine fact issues remained on whether J-B Weld’s advertising of “Made in USA” was false and whether Illinois Tool had standing. J-B Weld began in 2010 to sell theadlockers under the “Perma-Lock” name. What if J-B Weld falselyadvertised that its bonding products cure cancer or stopped global warming?
In 2010, the Second Circuit issued a watershed decision about secondary trademark infringement. Any error on country-of-origin disclosures sets up the third-party sellers for falseadvertising claims. Per Malwarebytes , the online marketplace should qualify for Section 230 protection for the Lanham Act falseadvertising claims).
In 2010, the FDA issued a warning to a different food and beverage company, stating that its products were mislabeled “in that they contain the chemical preservative[s] ascorbic acid and citric acid but their labels fail to declare these preservatives with a description of their functions.”
From the 2009 rankings to the 2010 rankings, USC Rossier’s reported acceptance rate dropped 40 percentage points (from 50.7% News and World Report’s 2010 edition of America’s Best Graduate Schools.” As Plaintiffs note, if the law were otherwise, “any business that submits false information to get a certification.
21, 2021) Though TocMail made it past a motion to dismiss , it failed at the summary judgment stage in its claim that Microsoft falselyadvertised its link scanning service’s capabilities, thus locking TocMail out of a big market. Microsoft Corp., 2021 WL 6750789, No. 20-60416-CIV-CANNON/Hunt (S.D.
Prior import plans in 2010-11 were paused. The court found that Industria’s argument for falseadvertising “falls on the wrong side of the line between a false association claim and a falseadvertising claim. Its cancellation petition for Zenú has been suspended during this litigation.
10] It concluded that a case under the Lanham Act is “exceptional” if the losing party was the plaintiff and was guilty of abuse of process in suing, or if the losing party was the defendant and had no defense yet persisted in the trademark infringement or falseadvertising for which it was being sued, in order to impose costs on its opponent. [11].
in medicinal chemistry from the University of Michigan in 2010, and his B.S. Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and falseadvertising.
Premier sold Joint Juice for treating/preventing joint pain; a jury found it liable to a consumer class for falseadvertising under NY law; and the district court awarded statutory damages to the class, but cut them by over 90%. The trial court also properly instructed the jury to limit its analysis to the packaging.
It had applied for trademarks for dolls named “Luciana” and “Princess Luciana” between 2006 and 2010, and its partner Mattel has long produced and sold space-themed dolls and accessories, including “Astronaut Barbie” in 1986. Not to mention that “dilution” is not the same thing as false endorsement!
These guidelines target practices such as false urgency, basket sneaking, subscription traps, confirm shaming, forced actions, nagging, interface interference, bait and switch, hidden costs, and disguised ads. d) Other IP Developments 1.
Thus, at trial, defendants weren’t allowed to present evidence showing that Hawai‘i doctors and patients hadn’t changed how they prescribed or consumed Plavix after information about the poor responder issue was added in 2010 to the black box warning.
Dark Patterns Unmasked: Examining Their Influence on Digital Platforms and User Behaviour Srijaa Grover and Yaggya Kapoor Harry Brignull introduced the concept of “dark patterns” in 2010, describing them as deceptive tactics aimed at boosting conversion rates.
After the first Oracle lawsuit in 2010, the court found that Rimini infringed Oracles copyrights by engaging in cross-use and creating copies of Oracles materials on Riminis computer systems. Rimini Street is a third-party provider and direct competitor with Oracle in the support-services market.
Pom Wonderful characterized the FDCA as designed primarily to protect the health and safety of the public at large rather than to prevent falseadvertising. Anyway, as a result, courts have adopted a general presumption that Lanham Act claims pertaining to FDCA-regulated products are permissible and, often, desirable. Irwin, 601 F.3d
25, 2024) This interesting lawsuit relies on Targets curatorial reputation for the falseadvertising claim. 393 (2010), as applied by the Eleventh Circuit to Alabamas law, Lisk v. Target Corp., 3d -, 2024 WL 4287669, No. 23-CV-02668 (KMM/DJF) (D. But Rule 23 governs the formation of classes in federal litigation.
1 (2010) (quoting Guggenheimer v. City of New York v. Smokes-Spirits.com, Inc., 3d 425 (2d Cir. 2008), revd on other grounds sub nom. City of New York, 559 U.S. Ginzburg, 43 N.Y.2d 2d 268, 273 (1977). Reasonable consumers can be less astute than average.
21, 2022) Geomatrix sued defendants for Sherman Act violations and falseadvertising in the market for onsite wastewater treatment systems, aka septic systems. Two competitors are defendants, as well as NSF, a nonprofit accredited by ANSI that “certifies many of the onsite wastewater products brought into commerce.”
Accidental” addition of medical marijuana IDs in 2010 led to rise in applications; withdrawn. A: will be talking to PTO historian; they ended up offering to refund fees to 2010 applicants if they’d abandon them, so may never find out what happened there. Some options are broad: medical services. but helpful to research.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content