2010 Derivative Work Marketing 
JIPL Online
MARCH 15, 2021
7] Before the court could decide if the subtitled version, a type of derivative work, could still be protected even if the underlying film on its own was available to be used by all, both parties settled. [8]. 9] Both parties reached an amicable settlement. [10] 11] The case has also been settled. [12] 21, 2020), [link]. [3]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
OCTOBER 19, 2021
Nevertheless, because adware often provided poor consumer experiences, adware largely fizzled out by 2010. ” No, that’s exactly what the derivative work right covers, and it’s the exact issue litigated in the old WhenU cases. WhenU concluded that copyright was a dead-end. 1-800 Contacts v. Silvaco Data Sys.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JIPEL Copyright Blog
APRIL 28, 2021
The problem is that most fanfiction could be characterized as derivative works of other already existing original works, as defined in 17 U.S.C. § Despite the barriers to fanfiction that the derivative work doctrine raises, fanfiction writers may find relief from liability through the fair use doctrine.
Copyright Lately
DECEMBER 24, 2023
In addition, the plaintiff hadn’t alleged that the market for her tattoo was in any way affected by Netflix’s blink-and-you’ll-miss-it use of her work. Teresa La Dart, the author of a 2010 poetry book called Lover , filed a copyright infringement lawsuit over a companion book for Swift’s 2019 album of the same name.
Copyright Lately
MAY 22, 2023
Goldsmith (“ Warhol “) is that relatively rare fair use case in which both the original and follow-on works were more or less directly competing in the same market. More typically, two works aren’t market substitutes, which means that determining whether a secondary use is justified is more difficult.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 29, 2024
Certain sections like 2(qq) and 38, define a “performer” and specify whether a person’s personality falls under the definition of a performer, under which a performer’s right may be asserted, hence prohibiting the unapproved marketing of a performer’s work. Baby Gift House, 2010 SCC OnLine Del 4790. [6]
LexBlog IP
OCTOBER 25, 2023
In Larson, Dorland claimed copyright in a 381-word letter posted to Facebook and further asserted that, therefore, each of the three versions of Larson’s The Kindest was a derivative work in which Dorland, therefore, owned the copyright because her letter and the later Larson works were substantially similar.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content