Remove 2010 Remove Contracts Remove Trademark Law
article thumbnail

Clever is as clever shifts fees

Likelihood of Confusion

Originally posted 2010-11-18 18:43:32. Republished by Blog Post PromoterRichard Bergovoy: The only thing worse for a licensor than losing money when its licensee files for bankruptcy is paying attorneys fees on top of that to stop the bleeding.

article thumbnail

Facebook Faces Contributory Trademark Liability for Marketplace Listings–Car-Freshner v. Meta

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Second, and more importantly, because the trademark law consequences of getting it wrong are so severe that few services would choose to roll the dice. The contributory trademark infringement claim survives a motion to dismiss. Contract Formation and Amendment The news wasn’t just bad for Facebook on the trademark front.

Trademark 115
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

If “Trespass to Chattels” Isn’t Limited to “Chattels,” Anarchy Ensues–Best Carpet Values v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

WhenU concluded that trademarks was a dead-end. Nevertheless, because adware often provided poor consumer experiences, adware largely fizzled out by 2010. The Silvaco court also cautioned that “the expansion of conversion law to reach intangible property should not be permitted to ‘displace other, more suitable law.’”

Licensing 105
article thumbnail

Benefits Of  The Madrid Protocol

Intepat

Not all states are contracting parties under the Madrid Protocol, such as Hong Kong, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Pakistan, etc. Therefore, in countries such as these which are non-contracting parties. the applicant would be required to file separate applications in order to garner protection for their mark.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. The Court limited the scope of Section 17(c) to apply to contracts where the relationship between the parties is akin to that of an apprenticeship.

IP 124
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Octobers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) 

SpicyIP

So … Prashant’s post was followed by a detailed post on Adwords and Trademark Law cautioning that a traditional interpretation of “use in commerce” could jeopardize the rights of trademark owners, given the evolving business models. Let’s see how it unfolded.

article thumbnail

The SHOP SAFE Act Is a Terrible Bill That Will Eliminate Online Marketplaces

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

In 2010, the Second Circuit issued a watershed decision about secondary trademark infringement. Note: can trademark owners take advantage of the US jurisdiction consent between the online marketplace and its third-party sellers? Normally trademark owners aren’t third-party beneficiaries of that contract.

Trademark 144