This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
These events point to two prevalent issues within the current legal framework: First, that current intellectual property laws do not properly acknowledge collective ownership over shared culture within Indigenous communities and second, whether tattoo designs have the potential to be protected through copyright laws.
Ali Shayif (2009) ( paywalled ) which has been cited numerous times by the Supreme Court and numerous High Courts of India ( here and here ). Existing trademarklaws sufficiently address online infringement without needing a new “e-infringement” category. E-Infringement Merely Academic Distinction?
The presence of cryptocurrency is constantly growing, and therefore, it needs the law to transform along with it to address its administration and execution. Several courts have had trouble in applying substantive TrademarkLaw to this field of technology. Can Cryptocurrencies be Protected under the TrademarkLaw?
Abhinandan, on the other hand, transferred his ownership to the real estate group in return for Rs. In Trademarklaw, it is important to determine if the mark is being used to offer goods and services similar to the ones for which it is registered. 500 crores (disputed figure). A legal entity cannot use Sec. Further, Sec.
It identifies the product of that company and recognizes its own and gives some rights to ownership that can be enforced. We came to know that people can style their avatars in the virtual that means there can be potential trademarks issues; many fraudsters can use an identical symbol to deceive people to buy items.
The question of ownership in the virtual world, particularly in video games, has long been debated. On the trademark side, relevant is this post by Bhavya Solanki and Medha Bhatt discussing the applicability of the fair use provisions of trademarklaw to the unauthorized use of trademarks in the virtual world.
In addition, the opinion has important ramifications for domestic trademarklaw through its identification of “use in commerce” as the actionable domestic conduct. Now in trademarklaw, extraterritorial reach is a simple on-off switch: Is there use in commerce or not? Google Inc. In Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content