Remove 2009 Remove Inventor Remove Patent Prosecution
article thumbnail

EFTA-India Free Trade Agreement and Patents Rules Amendment: Compromising Public Accountability and Transparency in the Indian Patent System

SpicyIP

In the Chemtura judgement (2009) concerning section 64(1)(m) (revocation for not furnishing Section 8 information), The Court emphasized on strict interpretation and application of the obligation. The implications of the amended Rules and TEPA are discussed later in the post.) However, in 2014, the Delhi High Court in Sukesh Behl V.

Patent 72
article thumbnail

Keeping up with Belgian patent litigation: Year case law review 2021

The IPKat

selected address issues such as SPC protection for combination products, double patenting, prosecution history estoppel and the influence of declarations made by the patentee in parallel proceedings, the possibility for national courts to request technical opinions from the EPO under Art. The decisions we (arbitrarily!)