Remove 2008 Remove Advertising Remove Designs Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

Competitor has standing to bring false association claims for false association w/3d party

43(B)log

12, 2021) After Lexmark , can a competitor bring a false association claim when the false association is with an unrelated third party? This court answers yes, though limits the effect of that by applying what looks like ordinary false advertising analysis. RectorSeal also sells a product known as the Metacaulk Box Guard.

article thumbnail

Gema USA, Inc. Sues Former Employee for Alleged Patent & Trademark Infringement

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

According to the complaint, Gema is a worldwide leader in the design and manufacture of electrostatic powder coating control units, and powder feed systems. The Design Patents are for a variety of powder guns and spray equipment. April 29, 2008. They allege to be an Integrator of Gema Products, not a Gema Distributor.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protect Apple’s App Store from Claims Over Cryptocurrency Theft–Diep v. Apple

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The plaintiffs claim it was a spoof app designed to steal cryptocurrency worth $5k in Diep’s case and $500k in Nagao’s case (ouch). False Advertising. eBay case from 2008. This lawsuit relates to the “Toast Plus” app that was available in Apple’s app store. ” Section 230.

article thumbnail

Agency liability theory satisfies "commercial advertising or promotion" requirement of promoting one's own products/services

43(B)log

The appellate panel remanded to decide whether the defendant’s publication was for the purpose of influencing consumers to buy the defendant’s goods or services, as additionally required for “commercial advertising or promotion” under the Lanham Act. During times when Defendants “have failed to meet their commitments to Usana”—i.e.,

article thumbnail

Fish & Richardson Elevates 17 Attorneys to Principal 

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

cum laude , in computer science and business from Lehigh University in 2008. Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising.

article thumbnail

Juul RICO and consumer protection classes certified despite different "nicotine journeys" among users

43(B)log

The court rejected defendants’ arguments that the putative classes were too heterogenous for certification: Some of the identified differences – for example, differences in advertisements that the named plaintiffs or class members may have seen over time or differences in the amount of JUUL product purchased – are simply not material.

article thumbnail

Cal. retains over $300 million in civil penalties against J&J on appeal

43(B)log

The trial court found Ethicon committed 153,351 violations of the Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and 121,844 violations of the False Advertising Law (FAL) and imposed a $1,250 civil penalty for each violation. Materiality can also be relevant to whether class treatment is justified in a private FAL/UCL restitution action.