Remove 2005 Remove Marketing Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Julys” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

Now, once more, guided by Sankofa sense, I set out to sift through the SpicyIP pages, starting from 2005 and journeying through the “Julys” of years past, to see what we have got or lost over the years. At the same time, South Africa also rolled a similar “Bayh Dole” ball.

article thumbnail

Legal Procedures on Selling Heirs’ Inherited Property in the UAE

LexBlog IP

28/2005 on Personal Status (known as the Personal Status Law), which adheres to Sharia law principles. 28/2005 on Personal Status Law, Muslim individuals can draft a will to bequeath up to one-third of their estate to specific beneficiaries of their choice. The sale can occur at market value or through auction. Dubai Decree No.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Not Invincible: A Cautionary Tale for Creators

Copyright Lately

Crabtree claims that Kirkman talked him into giving up co-ownership rights in “Invincible” by asking him to sign a document in 2005 that Kirkman represented would make it easier to market the work to licensees but which wouldn’t affect any of Crabtree’s rights. The Requirements for Copyright Joint Authorship and Co-Ownership.

article thumbnail

Validity and Applicability of Nunc Pro Tunc Agreements in Transferring Intellectual Property Rights: A Comparative Analysis of India and the US.

Intepat

To expedite market entry and avoid delays in formalizing an assignment or license agreement, parties sometimes rely on verbal agreements, which are considered valid under Indian Contract Law. Union of India, the question of validity of an assignment deed executed in 2009 and effective in 2005 was brought before the court.

article thumbnail

Protecting Product and Packaging Designs in China Part I – Trademarks

LexBlog IP

Back in 2005, the People’s Supreme Court (“SPC”) ruled in favor of Ferrero in the “Ferrero SPA v. However, the SPC’s ruling in 2005 was not based on trademark infringement because Ferrero had not yet obtained a registration for the trade dress as a 3D mark. The most famous 3D mark in China is Ferrero S.PA.’s

Design 52
article thumbnail

“Right to Access a Public Record” vs “Right to not Communicate the Work”: Where is Public Interest?”

SpicyIP

In Rajeev Kumar vs Jamia Millia Islamia (12th April 2021), an extremely interesting tussle was seen with the copyright over a thesis being pitted against a person’s right to obtain information under the Right to Information Act, 2005. JMI’s research policy, IPR Policy, and ordinance are silent on the ownership of Copyright in the thesis.

article thumbnail

Sony 'Vita' mark loses out in genuine use revocation proceedings before EU General Court

The IPKat

Background In July 2001, an EU trade mark application was filed for the word sign ‘Vita’ for certain Class 9 goods, and later registered in September 2005. Ownership of the registration was subsequently transferred to Sony Computer Entertainment Europe Ltd (the predecessor to Sony Interactive Entertainment Europe Ltd, ‘the applicant’).