2005 Copying Copyright Infringement Marketing 
TorrentFreak
MAY 14, 2022
On the flip side, today’s interconnected world has the ability to transform leaks into powerful advertising and hype, keeping message boards and social media alive with discussion of exciting new products, at zero cost to official marketing teams. Aside from generating more than 4.6
Olartemoure Blog
JULY 17, 2023
These new dolls captured about 40% of Barbie’s market share in five years, creating tension between Mattel and MGA. MGA alleged that Mattel had hired individuals to spy on toy designs and marketing plans. The court awarded MGA over $137 million for copyright infringement.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
OCTOBER 6, 2022
Last week, an Illinois jury awarded tattoo artist Catherine Alexander $3,750 in damages at the conclusion of a copyright infringement trial. Among the tens of thousands of tattooers working in the United States, the tiny handful who have brought copyright infringement claims are rare outliers. Copyright in Tattoos.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 2, 2022
. “Von D presumably did not need to copy the pose from the Portrait in order express a sentiment of melancholy.” Market Effect. “no one has told [Sedlik] they would not buy a copy of the Portrait because they had seen the Tattoo or social media posts about the Tattoo.” Prior Tattoo Copyright Blog Posts.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 1, 2023
By Guest Blogger Tyler Ochoa Recently, the Ninth Circuit reaffirmed what has become known as the “server test”: in order to be held directly liable for violating the public display right, the alleged infringer must have a fixed “copy” of the work stored on a server in its possession or control. July 17, 2023).
Selvam & Selvam Blog
DECEMBER 20, 2022
US$ 11000 as of 2005) in addition to the damages for the first time in 2005, stating that it was time to discourage lawbreakers “who indulge in violations with impunity out of lust for money.” This intention of the judiciary started becoming clear in the case of Time Inc. 5 lakhs (approx. 100 – Rs.150 150 (approx.
LexBlog IP
JULY 5, 2022
The term of a copyright for a particular work may depends on certain factors such as whether it has been published, and, if so, the date of first publication. [2] 2] The general rule for works created after January 1, 1978, provides that copyright protection lasts for the life of the author plus an additional 70 years. [3] ” [8].
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
101 
Let's personalize your content