Remove 2005 Remove Contracts Remove Fair Use Remove Marketing
article thumbnail

This Blog Has Jumped the Shark: I’m Covering a Copyright Opinion About a Tattoo of Tiger King’s Joe Exotic–Cramer v. Netflix

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Instead, she gets a 12(b)(6) dismissal based on fair use. Purpose and Character of Use. “use of the entire image of the Tattoo in the 8-way split screen montage, with visual and audio effects, is appropriate to Defendants’ transformative purpose of showing the public’s reaction to Season One of the Tiger King series.”

article thumbnail

Videogame Maker Has Implied License to Depict Copyrighted Tattoos–Hayden v. 2K

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Due to the fact-specific nature of doctrines like implied licenses and fair use, it’s possible the Hayden and Orton jury verdicts are consistent with each other. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards Copyright in Tattoos Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer. Warner Bros.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Jury Awards Damages to Tattoo Artist for Video-Game Depiction–Alexander v. WWE 2K (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

2K Games rejected similar infringement claims on the basis of de minimis use, implied license, and fair use. To briefly summarize, the court left the fair use question entirely to the jury, despite its own pre-trial order and the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Google v. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards.

Blogging 135
article thumbnail

Can Tattoos Infringe Copyrights, and If So, What Happens Then?–Sedlik v. Kat Von D

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Nature of Use. It wasn’t possible to use only a portion of the photo to depict melancholy, so I guess the court is saying Kat Von D should have picked a different image altogether? This factor weighs against fair use. Market Effect. Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer.

Copyright 143
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (August 28 – September 3)

SpicyIP

SpicyIP Tidbit: Some Strengthening of the Right to Information Act, 2005 From the Judicial Side Image from here RTI applications are often responded to with dodgy replies and incorrect information. Md Sabeeh Ahmad writes on the proposed changes to the timelines in the patent prosecution process. Dabur India Ltd.

article thumbnail

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The first Supreme Court ruling on fair use in over a quarter-century, and it’s a good one. The Crisis of Online Contracts (as Told in 10 Memes) , Notre Dame J. Before that, John Ottaviani and I assembled lists of top Internet IP cases for 2005 , 2004 and 2003. Mahanoy School District v. Emerging Tech.

article thumbnail

2022 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Two recent key developments were the Digital Markets Act and the Digital Services Act. This discourages visits to new sites, which will reward incumbents and thwart new market entrants. And yet…a #MAGA Ohio judge sealioned his rejection of Google’s motion to dismiss. at greater risk. 18, 2022 NetChoice LLC v.

Law 115