SpicyIP

DECEMBER 20, 2023

So, before 2023 turns into yesteryear, let’s see what the past Novembers on SpicyIP (2005 to present) have offered. E.g. Spadika Jayaraj discussed a case where the Delhi High Court dismissed a suit by a media house accusing copyright infringement on its database of users. Image from here November has passed.

Personality Rights 59

Personality Rights IP Licensing Copyright 59

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 8, 2023

In another development, Publishers united to Fight Copyright Infringement on ResearchGate , although it was settled out of court. It bears noting, however, that confidentiality may be a valid concern and shouldn’t be just disregarded for transparency alone.

Trademark 59

Trademark Publishing Journalism Copyright 59

SpicyIP

SEPTEMBER 4, 2023

SpicyIP Tidbit: Some Strengthening of the Right to Information Act, 2005 From the Judicial Side Image from here RTI applications are often responded to with dodgy replies and incorrect information. Md Sabeeh Ahmad writes on the proposed changes to the timelines in the patent prosecution process.

Cease and Desist 105

Cease and Desist Patent Prosecution Trademark Derivative Work 105

SpicyIP

NOVEMBER 13, 2023

Journey Through “Octobers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) The October “Flashbacks” are here! Lokesh covers another super interesting round of discussions stemming from SpicyIP’s Octobers (2005-present)! OpenAI to fund users found guilty of copyright infringement. Shrinath Travel Agency & Anr.

IP 59

IP Trademark Copyright Registration 59

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 24, 2023

The Evolution of Copyright and Translation Terms in India: Part III- A Different Term for Translations After an in-depth discussion on the terms of copyright in India, Prachi Mathur writes about the evolution of the terms of translation in India highlighting the debate regarding the reduction of the term for translations from 25 years to 10.

Registration 52

Registration Trademark Copyright Registering Trademarks 52

SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 9, 2023

Supreme Court of India , which dealt with issues of confidentiality, privacy (prior consent) of litigants and witnesses, restrictions on access to proceedings of trials and the preservation of the larger public interest due to the sensitivity of the proceedings. These are based on the principles set forth in Swapnil Tripathi v.

Copyright 136

Copyright Government Law Editing 136

IP Whiteboard

APRIL 15, 2021

4] The Court also granted partial summary judgment in respect of the copyright claim, [5] determining that the Mail Articles had indeed infringed upon the Duchess’ copyright. [6] 6] Despite this overall decision in respect of copyright infringement, the Court left one copyright issue to be fixed for determination at trial.

Privacy 40

Privacy Copyright Publishing Law 40