Remove 2005 Remove Brands Remove Marketing Remove Registering Trademarks
article thumbnail

The Interplay between Religious Sensitiveness and Trademark Law in India

IP and Legal Filings

Bhole Baba Milk Food Industries Ltd [8] , The Parul food Pvt ltd, sold ghee under the brand “Parul’s Lord Krishna,” which featured Krishna printed in a huge font, whereas the Appellant sold dairy products under the name “KRISHNA.” 4] Section 9(2)(b) of the Indian Trademarks Act, 1999. [5] 5] Aseri, Ankita.

article thumbnail

IP as Collateral

IIPRD

Intellectual Property such as patents, trademarks, brand value, copyright, etc have become foundational assets for several businesses, seeking greater importance and attention. The risks include unauthorised use and infringement, technological obsolescence, and the marketable nature of IP as collateral. Objective 5.11.1

IP 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court to Examine the Reach of the Lanham Act to Impose Liability on Conduct Outside of the United States

LexBlog IP

registered trademark may recover damages for uses of that trademark that occurred outside the United States and that were not likely to cause consumer confusion in the United States. brand owner’s enforcement strategy, foreign businesses who intentionally “get too close” to a U.S. Abitron Austria GmbH v.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

SpicyIP

Other Posts Journey Through “Novembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) Sift through the pages of November(s) posts on SpicyIP in another round of SpicyIP flashbacks by Lokesh. the Court held that such usage would amount neither to infringement of the trademark, nor taking of unfair advantage of the Respondent’s mark. and Ors. ,

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 8- May 13)

SpicyIP

Recently, tech brands Rario and Striker found themselves in a tussle over the exclusive right to use images and names of famous cricket players on their respective Online Fantasy Sports Platform. Case: Holyland Marketing Pvt. on 8 May, 2023 The plaintiff alleged infringement of registered trademark PANTOCID.

Trademark 104