2005 Advertising False Advertising Trademark 
43(B)log
MAY 16, 2022
To the extent [the Board’s] appeal attempts to improperly use trademark laws to block the expression of negative views about the university and its administration, such efforts fail.” Nor did it err in its false advertising analysis, which requires likely deception of reasonable consumers. Bosley Med. Kremer, 403 F.3d
Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation Blog
SEPTEMBER 25, 2021
September 24, 2021), the Court (1) denied Plaintiff Apex Clearing Corporation’s motion to exclude the expert testimony of defendants’ experts Mumford and Distler; (2) denied Plaintiff Axos Bank’s motion for summary judgment on four counts of trademark infringement; (3) denied defendants/counter-plaintiffs Axos Financial, Inc. Renosky , 399 F.3d
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Shades of Gray
NOVEMBER 2, 2016
Traditionally, attorneys’ fees were notoriously difficult for a prevailing party to recover in a trademark action. ICON Health & Fitness, Inc. , [1] relaxed the applicable standard in construing the Patent Act’s identical fee-shifting provision and will likely result in a lower bar to the recovery of fees in trademark disputes.
Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts
JANUARY 5, 2022
Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising. Patent & Trademark Office. He received his J.D.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 29, 2022
1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. 17 years later, I’m still blogging their ignoble trademark lawsuits. Some “highlights” of 1-800 Contacts’ trademark jurisprudence over the years: 1-800 Contacts v. WhenU (2d Cir. Keyword Ads. Proximity of goods.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
70 
Let's personalize your content