Remove 2005 Remove Advertising Remove False Advertising
article thumbnail

dismissal of ASU's claim against ASU_covid.parties Instagram upheld

43(B)log

Nor did it err in its false advertising analysis, which requires likely deception of reasonable consumers. In addition, “amendment would have also been futile given the non-commercial nature of Doe’s activities.” In the Ninth Circuit, “infringement claims are subject to a commercial use requirement.” Bosley Med. Kremer, 403 F.3d

article thumbnail

timeshare exit ads could proximately cause harm even w/o telling people to stop paying

43(B)log

Defendants NGT and NGE advertised an ability to help customers terminate their timeshare contract or ownership; other defendants were part of the exit process. As detailed below, none of the advertising specifically mentioned Diamond, nor did it direct, instruct nor encourage consumers to stop paying on their timeshare obligations.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

1-800 Contacts Loses YET ANOTHER Trademark Lawsuit Over Competitive Keyword Ads–1-800 Contacts v. Warby Parker

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

1-800 Contacts first appeared on this blog on February 9, 2005, my second day of blogging. This is the correct way to analyze the mark similarity factor in competitive keyword advertising cases, though many courts have not taken this approach. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. WhenU (2d Cir. Keyword Ads. Proximity of goods.

Trademark 111
article thumbnail

Judge Noreika Denies Plaintiffs and Defendants’ Respective Motions for Summary Judgment on Infringement/Non-Infringement in Trademark Infringement Action and Grants-in-Part Defendants’ Motion with Respect to Actual Damages

Delaware Intellectual Property Litigation Blog

[and that] Plaintiff did no corrective advertising.” 2005) for courts to consider when deciding whether to grant disgorgement damages in a trademark infringement action. Thus, the Court granted the motion with respect to actual damages. Renosky , 399 F.3d 3d 168, 175 (3d Cir.

article thumbnail

is there a difference between "clinically tested" and "clinically proven" to reasonable consumers?

43(B)log

The injunctive relief does what this xkcd cartoon mocks: Alt text: Blatantly banking on customers not understanding that it's like a Hollywood studio advertising that their new movie was 'watched by Roger Ebert'. The settlement included a fund of up to $8 million; unclaimed money would be returned to defendants. million. (If

article thumbnail

Fish & Richardson Elevates 17 Attorneys to Principal 

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

Vivian Cheng focuses her practice on trademark and copyright litigation and also counsels clients on a broad range of issues relating to trademark, trade dress, and copyright protection and enforcement, unfair competition, and false advertising. in computer engineering from Pennsylvania State University in 2005.

article thumbnail

A Bigger Exception to the Rule? Attorneys’ Fee Awards in Trademark Cases

Shades of Gray

10] It concluded that a case under the Lanham Act is “exceptional” if the losing party was the plaintiff and was guilty of abuse of process in suing, or if the losing party was the defendant and had no defense yet persisted in the trademark infringement or false advertising for which it was being sued, in order to impose costs on its opponent. [11].