Remove 2005 Remove Advertising Remove Fair Use
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Novembers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present)

SpicyIP

So, before 2023 turns into yesteryear, let’s see what the past Novembers on SpicyIP (2005 to present) have offered. In 2014, the Bombay High Court restrained the singer Mika Singh and the recording label OCP Music from publishing an advertisement that impinged Sonu’s personality rights. Image from here November has passed.

article thumbnail

WIPIP 2022, Session 3 (ROP/TM, (c) fair use)

43(B)log

Does it work differently in the US where there is a separate ROP? When, how and why would you seek permission to use persona. Industries: advertising, merchandising, movies/TV, and video games. A: History differs a lot—US foundation for ROP was set much earlier. You can cluster fair use cases.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Tattoo Artist Wins Copyright Claim, But Gets Zero Damages–Alexander v. Take Two

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The denial of fair use stands, but the damages get zeroed out. Fair Use Nature of Use “Defendants’ use of the tattoos was clearly commercial.” The videogame made a commercial editorial use of the tattoo. ” I could see the fair use analysis going the other way on appeal.

Copyright 107
article thumbnail

This Blog Has Jumped the Shark: I’m Covering a Copyright Opinion About a Tattoo of Tiger King’s Joe Exotic–Cramer v. Netflix

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Instead, she gets a 12(b)(6) dismissal based on fair use. Purpose and Character of Use. Plus, the tattoo affected the fair use analysis because it established the impossibility of competitive tension between the tattoo artist and Netflix. For this, Cramer demanded $10M dollars from Netflix (later dropped to $50k).

article thumbnail

Videogame Maker Has Implied License to Depict Copyrighted Tattoos–Hayden v. 2K

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Due to the fact-specific nature of doctrines like implied licenses and fair use, it’s possible the Hayden and Orton jury verdicts are consistent with each other. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards Copyright in Tattoos Also, see Q2 of my 2005 contracts law exam and the sample answer. Warner Bros.

article thumbnail

Can Tattoos Infringe Copyrights, and If So, What Happens Then?–Sedlik v. Kat Von D

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Nature of Use. It wasn’t possible to use only a portion of the photo to depict melancholy, so I guess the court is saying Kat Von D should have picked a different image altogether? This factor weighs against fair use. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards. ” That sends the issue to the jury. Warner Bros.

Copyright 144
article thumbnail

New Copyright Lawsuit Targets Uploaders of 10-Minute Movie Edits

TorrentFreak

When YouTube first got off the ground in 2005, most of its users would’ve been oblivious to how closely copyright law would govern their online activities moving forward. Seventeen years later, with billions of internet users now both consumers and creators of content, people are becoming more educated.

Editing 142