2005 Advertising Copyright Infringement Fair Use 
SpicyIP
DECEMBER 20, 2023
So, before 2023 turns into yesteryear, let’s see what the past Novembers on SpicyIP (2005 to present) have offered. E.g. Spadika Jayaraj discussed a case where the Delhi High Court dismissed a suit by a media house accusing copyright infringement on its database of users. Image from here November has passed.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
APRIL 22, 2024
Due to the fact-specific nature of doctrines like implied licenses and fair use, it’s possible the Hayden and Orton jury verdicts are consistent with each other. Kat Von D Depicting Randy Orton’s Tattoos in a Video Game Could Be Copyright Infringement–Alexander v. Warner Bros.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
OCTOBER 6, 2022
Last week, an Illinois jury awarded tattoo artist Catherine Alexander $3,750 in damages at the conclusion of a copyright infringement trial. 2K Games rejected similar infringement claims on the basis of de minimis use, implied license, and fair use. Tattoo Advertising/Human Billboards. Warner Bros.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
OCTOBER 25, 2023
Instead, she gets a 12(b)(6) dismissal based on fair use. Purpose and Character of Use. Plus, the tattoo affected the fair use analysis because it established the impossibility of competitive tension between the tattoo artist and Netflix. For this, Cramer demanded $10M dollars from Netflix (later dropped to $50k).
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JUNE 2, 2022
” As for whether the tattoo is substantially similar to the copyrighted elements of the photo, the court sends the issue to the jury. Nature of Use. It wasn’t possible to use only a portion of the photo to depict melancholy, so I guess the court is saying Kat Von D should have picked a different image altogether?
TorrentFreak
MAY 24, 2022
When YouTube first got off the ground in 2005, most of its users would’ve been oblivious to how closely copyright law would govern their online activities moving forward. Seventeen years later, with billions of internet users now both consumers and creators of content, people are becoming more educated.
IP and Legal Filings
JANUARY 22, 2024
The crux of this debate is the argument that if the theft of restricted digital content is for the purpose of knowledge and research, it should be considered as an act done under ‘fair use’ and ‘fair dealing’ of the content. Digital Rights Management & Fair Use If everything is so well designed, then where is the issue?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
59 
Let's personalize your content