Remove 2004 Remove Personality Rights Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Music Academy v. V Shrinivasan: “Will”ing Posthumous Privacy/Publicity Rights into Existence

SpicyIP

Madurai Shanmukhavadivu Subbulakshmi(16 September 1916 11 December 2004). Rothman (see here ) called no-privacy-rights-for-the dead doctrine . In this post, I will first discuss the current state of precedents in the context of posthumous rights. His previous posts can be accessed here. Image from here Music Academy v.

Privacy 59
article thumbnail

Publicity Rights Concerning Sports Athletes

IP and Legal Filings

[iii] Provisions in Indians Laws Trademarks Act, 1999 does not make any exact provision for publicity rights, but its definition of ‘Marks’ contains names within its ambit. Going ahead in this fast-forwarding world, publicity rights concerning sports in India will develop and can reach a high of excellent dominance like European countries.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (July 12 – 18)

SpicyIP

She highlights that the Court refused to afford post mortem protection to personality rights of the actor. Nishtha emphasises that in determining whether the deceased possessed personality rights enforceable by his heirs, the Court based its reasoning on the intertwining between privacy and publicity rights.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2024

SpicyIP

T Series And Another vs M/S Dreamline Reality Movies on 22 February [Punjab and Haryana High Court] The case concerned the adaptation of late Jaswinder Kaurs biography into a cinematographic film and deals with interplay of copyright with personality rights. Kaur, the defendants cannot claim infringement of their copyrights.

IP 100