Remove 2004 Remove Copying Remove Due Diligence
article thumbnail

Synergy Between Ipr And E-Commerce Platforms

IIPRD

There are few e-commerce companies which explicitly make copies of brands such as Firstcopyclub, ShoesKartel etc. Challenges in IPR Regulation in e-commerce As per a survey, around 38% online buyers experienced counterfeit products and 1/3 rd people have gotten copied products. In the case of Tiffany v. 3] Banyan Tree Holding Ltd.

article thumbnail

Central Role of IP and Marketing in Business Design

azrights

This is one of the many misconceptions about IP that I’ve noticed since starting my business in 2004. It frustrates me that people turn to me when they’re copied, assuming this is the kind of work I’m engaged in doing, when they’ve never consulted me before about their IP. I’m hoping to change that.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

German Federal Court of Justice: Copyright Case Law of 2021 – Part II

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The existence of Störerhaftung is also dependent on the violation of reasonable (due diligence) obligations. That notification has to include all relevant circumstances giving rise to due diligence obligations. party in breach of a duty of care). However, importers and retailers can also be affected.

article thumbnail

Copyright case law of the German Bundesgerichtshof 2015 – 2019 – Part 4 of 4: Copyright contract law and enforcement

Kluwer Copyright Blog

The defendant in that case had offered adapters for sale which enabled Nintendo games, that had been produced by third parties in circumvention of copy protection measures and downloaded from the internet, to be used on the Nintendo games console. This does require a violation of a due diligence obligation, however.

article thumbnail

The Ninth Circuit Reaffirms the Discovery Rule for the Copyright Act’s Statute of Limitations — Starz v. MGM (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Under the “discovery rule,” the limitations period begins to run when “the plaintiff discovers, or with due diligence should have discovered, the injury that forms the basis for the claim.” 1994), the plaintiff gave a copy of his screenplay to a film producer in 1985. Petrella , 572 U.S. The Ninth Circuit Precedents. In Roley v.