2004 Cease and Desist Intellectual Property 
IPilogue
FEBRUARY 1, 2023
Controversy ensued when a Mexican food restaurant in the UK, Taquería, issued a cease and desist letter to a similar restaurant, Sonora Taquería, for infringement of their registered mark “Taqueria.” Presumably, when it was granted in 2004, the mark was not considered generic or descriptive.
The IPKat
JANUARY 31, 2022
Under article 8(1) of the Enforcement Directive (Directive 2004/48/EC) a claimant in infringement proceedings can request a court to order certain parties to disclose information. This so-called ‘right to information’ includes information on the origin of the infringement (e.g. One image is depicted below.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
The IPKat
NOVEMBER 29, 2023
It, however, appears that the sign Crompouce® was registered as a trademark with the Benelux Office for Intellectual Property (BOIP) already in 2020 and the design was registered as a Benelux design in the same year. In the media, a discussion emerged among Dutch IP professionals about whether Crompouce® is a valid trademark?
LexBlog IP
NOVEMBER 4, 2022
.” Ye claims the hamburger restaurant, located in Ivanhoe (a suburb of Melbourne), continues to have food on its menu named after the artist’s 2004 album and says neither his store nor products are approved for use by Ye. ”, intellectual property law expert, Ben Hopper told 7NEWS.
IP Tech Blog
MAY 17, 2022
With judgment of 28 April 2022, Case C-44/21 – Phoenix Contact , the European Court of Justice (ECJ) declared this practice incompatible with EU Directive 2004/48/EC (Enforcement Directive). In the event of a cease and desist letter, it is therefore becoming even more important to immediately set up a suitable defense strategy.
The IPKat
MAY 26, 2023
This question was whether, under Article 8(1) Enforcement Directive (2004/48/EC ) (the Enforcement Directive), a claimant in infringement proceedings can request a court to order certain parties to disclose information. Article 4(a) refers to the ‘holders of intellectual property rights’ being entitled to apply for an Article 8 request.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 6, 2021
Evansville, Indiana – In 2004, the Coca-Cola Company launched its Full Throttle® energy drink brand, which was later apparently acquired by Monster Beverage Company (“Monster”) in 2015. Energy also claims it has used a distinctive trade dress on its Full Throttle® products since 2004. Registration Nos. 1125(a).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
104 
Let's personalize your content