This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
INTRODUCTION For a long time, logos, names, and jingles have been the mainstays of trademarklaw. A recent trend in branding, however, is the use of non-traditional trademarks such as haptic markings. In 2003, the firm’s trademark in Germany was protected due to its distinctive design. are two examples.
He was unmistakably aware of the nuances regarding colours in trademarklaw. Broadly speaking, trademarks are of two types: traditional and non-traditional. [1] 2] However, the quintessential reason for such distinction is due to a slightly elevated standard for the registration of non-traditional marks.
Under Section 2(1)(zb) of the Act, any word, label, name, device, brand, ticket, signature, heading, letter, numeral, the shape of products, packaging, the combination of colors, or any combination thereof can be registered as a trademark if the same fulfills the criteria of distinctiveness and graphical representation. 2003 (27) PTC 478 Del.
However, the visual similarity was only a supplementary point in the Courts finding of infringement which was primarily based on the identicality of the business names, and their registration under the same classes. Relying on this observation, the Pune court found the local eatery to be a prior user of the contested trademark.
Non-Conventional trademarks are full of potential but still present some unique challenges, especially in jurisdictions like India, which is in process of evolving & developing their legal framework to accept these novel identifiers. On the other hand, single colour trademarks are not specifically mentioned in the act.
This is primarily because of the clash between the traditional concept of trademarks and the ever-growing need to find newer ways to differentiate one’s product and services from competitors. [1] 4] Second, the qualification for registering a trademark, both traditional and non-traditional, essentially remains the same.
However, the extent of protection and applicable principles of trademarklaw that surround the numeral trademark takes center stage in the discussion. Names like 7-eleven, 5 Star, 7Up, and 99acres resonate with consumers, widely reflecting the innovative use of number as brand identities.
This post discusses the case and argues that there already exists a mechanism under the Patent and trademarklaws that govern and supervise such agents. Plus, I argue that the liability of such an agent should be analogized with legal practitioners for which we already have sound jurisprudence and laws regarding professional conduct.
Today, several generic terms that we use, such as ‘escalator,’ ‘xerox,’ ‘cellophane,’ sound common but were once protected as trademarks. ” For combating trademark genericide, conventional trademark enforcement measures have to be coupled with unconventional methods.
It was pleaded that the defendants were using a deceptively similar trademark that could not be differentiated from the trademark registered and used by the Plaintiff. Image Sources : Gettyimages] The trademark was first adopted by M/s Lal Chand Tirath Ram Rice Mills in 1985 and thereafter, in 2003, was assigned to the Plaintiff.
Regarding the IPR matters, Cambodia has issued the following legal documents: • Law concerning Marks, Trade Name and Acts of Unfair Competition dated January 8, 2002; • Law on Patents, Utility Model Certificates and Industrial Designs, in force since January 2003; • Law on Copyright and Related Right, in force since March 2003.
The year 2022 has been an extremely important year for the development of trademark jurisprudence in India. There have been various landmark judgements which have not only highlighted cardinal principles of trademarklaw but have also given a nuanced understanding of how Courts interpret statutory trademark provisions.
It’s not possible to “trespass” an intangible asset; any legal protection for the asset comes from contract law (but the plaintiffs gave a license) or IP law, such as copyright law, which the plaintiffs aren’t invoking. Citing a 2003 Ninth Circuit case, Kremen v. It didn’t.
Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademarklaw. So too with plaintiffs’ 2003 Documentary. Trademark etc. Lanham Act claims based on common-law rights were barred by laches.
19 The distinctive character of a trade mark must be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the perception of the relevant public (see judgment of 12 February 2004, Henkel, C‑218/01, EU:C:2004:88, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited). Duck Boat Tours, Inc.
Under the trademarklaw, the trade dress encompasses the visual aspect of a product and it comprises several distinctive features with respect to the shape, size, packaging, colour combination, textures, graphics etc. References: [1] 2003 (27) PTC 478 Del. [2] Scope for Protection of Trade Dress in India. 2] CS(COMM) 76/2018.
The first and the foremost question which crosses our minds is that does the digital assets in the virtual reality fall under the category of “Goods” under trademarklaw, and who should be held liable for infringement when the infringer is unknown. It also protects the product from unauthorized use by a third party.
Although companies had been employing the sensory aspects unofficially for decades, they underwent significant changes in their development when they were officially recognized as trademarks and were subsequently granted legal protection and registration. In Colgate Palmolive Company And Anr. vs Anchor Health And Beauty Care Pvt.
It can also mean as the proxy or substitute holder of rights here on earth because no spiritual being will receive a copyright certificate, trademarkregistrations, or letters patent. The report notes on page 11 that “In 2003, research estimates put the [U.S.] market for religious publishing and products at $6.8
The Court rationalized that in trademarklaw, even a single dominant element within a composite mark can warrant protection if it has strong brand recognition. A trademark infringement and passing off suit was filed against the appellant alleging that its Cheetal device mark is similar to the respondents Double Deer Mark.
Under Section 47(1)(b), a trademark can be removed if it remains unused for five consecutive years. The Court found that the respondents mark was merely a hindrance to Kiranakarts ZEPTO registration and did not serve a legitimate commercial purpose. Addisons Paint & Chemicals Ltd. A Test or a Hurdle? In M J Exports Pvt Ltd v.
Arvee Enterprises in 2003. Jaitley’s right and pronounced that any person may be restrained from using the names of popular or well-known celebrities, when the particular name is a well-known trademark as envisaged under the basic principles of trademarklaw and thatcelebrity is entitled to use his name for commercial purposes.
Jeanne Fromer (with Beebe and Stein), An Empirical Picture of TrademarkLaw We are running out of competitively effective word marks. Inadequacy of TM law: visual depletion and congestion; difficulty handling visual similarity in confusion analysis; difficulty handling visual distinctiveness in the sense of source identification.
. § 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent….”
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 9,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content