43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. So too with plaintiffs’ 2003 Documentary. Trademark etc. Lanham Act claims based on common-law rights were barred by laches.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

Intepat

JUNE 7, 2024

Although companies had been employing the sensory aspects unofficially for decades, they underwent significant changes in their development when they were officially recognized as trademarks and were subsequently granted legal protection and registration. In Colgate Palmolive Company And Anr. vs Anchor Health And Beauty Care Pvt.

Trademark 52

Trademark Brands Branding Branding 52

IIPRD

JANUARY 21, 2022

Under the trademark law, the trade dress encompasses the visual aspect of a product and it comprises several distinctive features with respect to the shape, size, packaging, colour combination, textures, graphics etc. References: [1] 2003 (27) PTC 478 Del. [2] Scope for Protection of Trade Dress in India. 2] CS(COMM) 76/2018.

Brands 40

Brands Branding Branding Trademark Law 40

Intepat

DECEMBER 6, 2022

The year 2022 has been an extremely important year for the development of trademark jurisprudence in India. There have been various landmark judgements which have not only highlighted cardinal principles of trademark law but have also given a nuanced understanding of how Courts interpret statutory trademark provisions.

Trademark 98

Trademark Trademark Law Registering Trademarks Law 98

IIPRD

OCTOBER 17, 2022

The first and the foremost question which crosses our minds is that does the digital assets in the virtual reality fall under the category of “Goods” under trademark law, and who should be held liable for infringement when the infringer is unknown. It also protects the product from unauthorized use by a third party.

IP 52

IP Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Trademark 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

OCTOBER 19, 2021

It’s not possible to “trespass” an intangible asset; any legal protection for the asset comes from contract law (but the plaintiffs gave a license) or IP law, such as copyright law, which the plaintiffs aren’t invoking. Citing a 2003 Ninth Circuit case, Kremen v. It didn’t.

Licensing 97

Licensing Copyright Contracts Advertising 97

IP and Legal Filings

APRIL 14, 2023

It was pleaded that the defendants were using a deceptively similar trademark that could not be differentiated from the trademark registered and used by the Plaintiff. Image Sources : Gettyimages] The trademark was first adopted by M/s Lal Chand Tirath Ram Rice Mills in 1985 and thereafter, in 2003, was assigned to the Plaintiff.

Trademark 95

Trademark Brands Branding Branding 95

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

It can also mean as the proxy or substitute holder of rights here on earth because no spiritual being will receive a copyright certificate, trademark registrations, or letters patent. The report notes on page 11 that “In 2003, research estimates put the [U.S.] market for religious publishing and products at $6.8

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 29, 2022

19 The distinctive character of a trade mark must be assessed by reference, first, to the goods or services in respect of which registration is sought and, second, to the perception of the relevant public (see judgment of 12 February 2004, Henkel, C‑218/01, EU:C:2004:88, paragraph 50 and the case-law cited). Duck Boat Tours, Inc.

Trademark 52

Trademark Registration Music Intellectual Property 52

IP and Legal Filings

DECEMBER 6, 2023

Arvee Enterprises in 2003. Jaitley’s right and pronounced that any person may be restrained from using the names of popular or well-known celebrities, when the particular name is a well-known trademark as envisaged under the basic principles of trademark law and thatcelebrity is entitled to use his name for commercial purposes.

Privacy 105

Privacy Intellectual Property Law Intellectual Property Advertising 105

Patently-O

DECEMBER 12, 2021

. § 1052(c) provides, in pertinent part, that the PTO must deny federal registration to a trademark if it “[c]onsists of or comprises a name, portrait, or signature identifying a particular individual except by his written consent….”

Registration 69

Registration Government Advertising Advertising 69