article thumbnail

Health Tracker Systems Alleges Garmin’s Smartwatch Infringes Patents

JD Supra Law

Garmin”) for patent infringement in the Central District of California on March 6, 2023. The lawsuit alleges that Garmin’s Forerunner 45/45S smartwatch infringes U.S. 6,582,380, entitled “System and Method of Monitoring and Modifying Human Activity-Based Behavior,” which issued in 2003, and expired in June 2021.

Patent 96
article thumbnail

Logos Remain Relevant: Source Confusion and Design Patent Infringement

Patently-O

This post will focus on another key issue from the case – the relevance of logos in design patent infringement analysis. Trademark Infringement The standards for proving design patent infringement and trademark infringement differ significantly regarding the relevance of consumer confusion about product source.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Manhattan Jury Orders Nintendo to Pay $30 Million for Patent Infringement

Greenspoon Marder LLP

million in damages to Tomita Technologies for patent infringement. After leaving the company, he applied for the patent in issue in March of 2003, and the patent was issued in 2008 licensed to Tomita Technologies. A Manhattan jury earlier this month ordered Nintendo to pay $30.2 In 2012, U.S.

article thumbnail

Tier I, Tier II, Time for Experts; The Curious Case of Scientific Advisers, Party Expert and Two Tiered Confidentiality Club 

SpicyIP

This case pertains to patent infringement concerning two process patents related to the fungicide Azoxystrobin. On January 8, 2025, the Delhi High Court, presided over by Hon’ble Justice Amit Bansal, delivered a significant ruling in the case of Syngenta Limited and Anr. vs. GSP Crop Science Private Limited (See here ).

article thumbnail

Within The Scope of This Concise Analysis, the Case of Bajaj Auto Ltd. v. T.V.S. Motor Company Ltd. Is Investigated

IP and Legal Filings

Introduction The main emphasis of the case pertains to accusations of patent infringement made by the defendant, as well as the subsequent pursuit of damages. The purpose of submitting the application was to mitigate the risk of patent infringement amongst the ongoing legal proceedings. 1903 RPC 225. 1906 RPC 6.

article thumbnail

Plagiarism Police come for Winston & Strawn

Patently-O

Winston Strawn Plagiarism Complaint Winston Strawn Plagiarism Attachments I recall being asked to draft my first patent infringement complaint back in early 2003 – a few months after graduating from law school. Winston & Strawn represented another defendant, Silicon Motion, in a related case also filed by UTL.

article thumbnail

Patent Translation: Good and Bad?

IP and Legal Filings

The translated patent must reflect the unambiguous technical and legal aspects. The translation if done in the best manner will help the applicant in any patent infringement case that might arise. In India, under Rule 20 of Indian Patent Rules 2003, the translation requirement is specified if the application is not in English.

Patent 98