Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 16, 2024

Copyright Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1) Note About Fair Use Cartoon Network v. Trademarks and Domain Names Review: 15 U.S.C. 8131 [[link] Trademark FAQs Trademark Glossary A. . 8131 [[link] Trademark FAQs Trademark Glossary A. Privacy Review: 16 C.F.R. CSC (2d Cir.)

Editing 101

Editing Law Social Media Contracts 101

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 2, 2021

I’ve now framed it as a note about California’s consumer privacy laws. US case, which overwrote most of my prior note on Nosal and Power Ventures. Note About Fair Use. Trademarks and Domain Names. Trademark FAQs. Trademark Glossary. Review: Google’s Trademark Policy [[link].

Editing 145

Editing Law Privacy Contracts 145

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 12, 2022

Note About Fair Use. Trademarks and Domain Names. Trademark FAQs. Trademark Glossary. Review: Google’s Trademark Policy [[link]. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations. s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws. Cartoon Network v.

Editing 141

Editing Law Social Media Privacy 141

43(B)log

DECEMBER 20, 2022

Plaintiffs also alleged infringement of Monbo’s right of publicity, unjust enrichment, and violations of the Lanham Act and related Maryland trademark law. Plaintiffs allegedly used the 12 O’Clock Boyz trademarks since 2001 and registered the marks in 2016. The court, in a careful opinion, rejected all the claims.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Trademark Copyright Editing 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

Copyright Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1) Note About Fair Use Cartoon Network v. Trademarks and Domain Names Review: 15 U.S.C. 8131 [[link] Trademark FAQs Trademark Glossary A. . 8131 [[link] Trademark FAQs Trademark Glossary A. Privacy Review: 16 C.F.R. CSC (2d Cir.)

Editing 52

Editing Law Contracts Privacy 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 12, 2021

Can you register a famous person’s name as your trademark without their consent? Patent and Trademark Office interprets this to mean no, never, no matter what. Is the PTO capable of applying First Amendment balancing tests such as transformative use or fair use in routine registration decisions?; 26] Which one?

Registration 69

Registration Government Advertising Advertising 69

43(B)log

AUGUST 8, 2024

Prince finds fairness in many images when Prince didn’t care about other artists; Graham v. Prince rejects fair use when his stated intent was to have fun. Sexual pleasure: when mark is used to “titillate” or convey a message that sex is good, that doesn’t establish parody or commentary. Disdain as paradigmatic fair use.

IP 59

IP Fair Use Privacy Licensing 59