Remove 2003 Remove Fair Use Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Time for the 12 O'Clock Boyz to go: court shuts down (c)/TM lawsuit against documentary & feature film about Baltimore bikers

43(B)log

Nathan directed the allegedly infringing 2013 Documentary, which “tells the story of Pug, a thirteen-year-old child who wants to be a ‘12 O’Clock Boy,’ just like [he] has repeatedly watched in [the 2001 and 2003 Documentaries].” So too with plaintiffs’ 2003 Documentary. The similarities in setting, theme, etc.

article thumbnail

Announcing the 2021 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

I’ve now framed it as a note about California’s consumer privacy laws. US case, which overwrote most of my prior note on Nosal and Power Ventures. Note About Fair Use. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations. Review: CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 [[link] and 16 C.F.R.

Editing 145
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Announcing the 2022 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Note About Fair Use. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations. s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws. Review: CAN-SPAM Act of 2003 [[link] and 16 C.F.R. Comparison of Trespass to Chattels Doctrines. Hamidi (Cal. Register.com v. Cartoon Network v.

Editing 145
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2024 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Copyright Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1) Note About Fair Use Cartoon Network v. Privacy Review: 16 C.F.R. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations Overview of the E.U.’s s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws In re. Bright Data V.

Editing 116
article thumbnail

Announcing the 2023 Edition of My Internet Law Casebook

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Copyright Copyright Basics (Copyright Office Circular 1) Note About Fair Use Cartoon Network v. Privacy Review: 16 C.F.R. Part 312, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act’s Regulations Overview of the E.U.’s s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) and State Consumer Privacy Laws In re. Hamidi (Cal.

Editing 52
article thumbnail

2021 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Apple positions itself as more privacy-supportive than the other tech giants, but then it committed an unforgiveable privacy faux pas by unveiling plans to proactively scan client-side files for illegal CSAM. The first Supreme Court ruling on fair use in over a quarter-century, and it’s a good one. Emerging Tech.

Law 145
article thumbnail

2022 Internet Law Year-in-Review

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

It also puts users’ privacy and security (including minors’!) Moody, amicus brief in support of the petition for certiorari , November 2022 Comments to the CPPA’s Proposed Regulations Pursuant to the Consumer Privacy Rights Act of 2020, California Privacy Protection Agency, August 2022 NetChoice LLC v.

Law 122