Patently-O

MAY 2, 2022

The “on sale bar” prohibits patenting an invention that was placed “on sale” prior to the application being filed. 126 (1877) (delay excused by “bona fide effort to bring his invention to perfection, or to ascertain whether it will answer the purpose intended”). ” Pfaff v. Wells Elecs., 55 (1998).

Invention 82

Invention Contracts Licensing Inventor 82

IIPRD

OCTOBER 17, 2022

These trademark applications consist of Nike’s logo “just do it” and air Jordan designs. It identifies the product of that company and recognizes its own and gives some rights to ownership that can be enforced. With new advancements in technology, new challenges come forward. Patent Infringement. Conclusion and Suggestions.

IP 52

IP Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Trademark 52

43(B)log

AUGUST 5, 2021

Standard debate assumes semi omniscience of designer neutrally concerned with social welfare. Bespoke systems are often underutilized by their own designers and outmoded. Examples: Vessel Hull Design Protection Act. Was more heavily used 1999-2003. independent invention). Sharp shift to regular regime.

IP 45

IP Invention Designs Design 45

Intepat

DECEMBER 6, 2022

The Respondent contended that “Renaissance” was not a coined or inventive word but rather generic and was used honestly and concurrently by the Respondent since 15 years. The Plaintiff’s claimed that they adopted and coined the trademark “Forzest” in 2003. However, it was distinct due to its emphasis on the dominant part test.

Trademark 98

Trademark Trademark Law Registering Trademarks Law 98

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

The report notes on page 11 that “In 2003, research estimates put the [U.S.] Patent and Trademark Office granted ownership of the word “Jesus” to Jesus Jeans, owned by a publicly traded Italian company, BasicNet, giving the company exclusive rights in America to sell clothing bearing the name “Jesus.”

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52

Barry Sookman

MAY 4, 2020

Is an invention autonomously generated by artificial intelligence patentable? This is a question that is being studied including by the United States Patent and Trade Mark Office (USPTO) which launched an investigation into issues associated with patenting artificial intelligence inventions. patent law, 35 USC §§ 1 et seq.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Inventor Invention Copyright 52